Impact of Sex: Determination of Alcohol Neuroadaptation and Reinforcement - Wiren - 2006 - Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research - Wiley Online Library
Volume 30, Issue 2

Impact of Sex: Determination of Alcohol Neuroadaptation and Reinforcement

Kristine M. Wiren

Oregon Health & Science University

VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon

Search for more papers by this author
Joel G. Hashimoto

VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon

Search for more papers by this author
Paul E. Alele

Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho

Search for more papers by this author
Leslie L. Devaud

Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho

Search for more papers by this author
Kimber L. Price

the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Lawrence D. Middaugh

the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Kathleen A. Grant

Oregon Health & Science University

Search for more papers by this author
Deborah A. Finn

Oregon Health & Science University

VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 January 2006
Citations: 27
RemoteXs
Reprint requests: Dr. Kristine Wiren, Oregon Health & Science University, VA Medical Center P3 R&D39, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, Portland, OR 97239‐2964; Fax: 503‐273‐5351; E‐mail: wirenk@ohsu.edu

Supported in part by NIH Grants AA13194 (KMW), AA011877 (LLD), RR016454 (PA and LLD), AA10761, DA16511 (KLP, LDM), AA013510, AA011997 (KAG), and AA12439 (DAF) and the Medical Research Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs (DAF).

Abstract

This article represents the proceedings of a symposium at the Research Society on Alcoholism meeting in Santa Barbara, California. The organizers/chairs were Kristine M. Wiren and Deborah A. Finn. Following a brief introduction by Deborah Finn, the presentations were (1) The Importance of Gender in Determining Expression Differences in Mouse Lines Selected for Chronic Ethanol Withdrawal Severity, by Kristine M. Wiren and Joel G. Hashimoto; (2) Sex Differences in Ethanol Withdrawal Involve GABAergic and Stress Systems, by Paul E. Alele and Leslie L. Devaud; (3) The Influence of Sex on Ethanol Consumption and Reward in C57BL/6 Mice, by Kimber L. Price and Lawrence D. Middaugh; and (4) Sex Differences in Alcohol Self‐administration in Cynomolgus Monkeys, by Kathleen A. Grant.

THE CONCEPT THAT the physiological differences between males and females can contribute to a host of factors, such as disease risk and response to drugs, is not new. Certainly, a recent special issue of Science (10 June 2005; 308:1569–1594) on Women's Health highlighted many points of divergence. A better understanding of the influence of one's sex on health and disease will be gained as research continues to examine differences between males and females in basic biological responses to environmental challenges, to therapeutic agents, and to drugs of abuse.

Sexual differentiation of the brain is due to organizational effects of gonadal steroids during a critical period of development in primates and rodents, which varies depending on the species (e.g., Roselli, 2003). The early hormonal milieu contributes to the sexual dimorphisms (i.e., sex differences in neural morphology) in the nervous system, which in combination with the activational effects of gonadal steroids throughout puberty and adulthood, could impact neural function and behavior. As ethanol (EtOH) is a drug that has complex actions in the central nervous system, including interactions with multiple receptor systems (e.g., Crews et al., 1996; Deitrich et al., 1989), it is likely that inherent differences in brain architecture and neurotransmission could modulate EtOH sensitivity differently in males than in females.

Clinical and preclinical studies document the existence of sex differences in sensitivity to a number of alcohol‐related behaviors (see Devaud et al., 2003; Lancaster, 1995). By determining the influence of gender on the neurobiological systems underlying the actions of EtOH, a better understanding of the risks associated with EtOH abuse may be identified. Moreover, by determining how one's sex determines outcomes, it becomes possible to examine innate differences in gene expression that may underlie differences in the neuroadaptive changes associated with the repeated use of EtOH or in the behavioral response to EtOH. Therefore, this symposium will focus on the impact of gender on neuroadaptive changes that occur in response to EtOH exposure as well as the impact of sex on measures of EtOH reinforcement.

THE IMPORTANCE OF GENDER IN DETERMINING EXPRESSION DIFFERENCES IN MOUSE LINES SELECTED FOR CHRONIC ETHANOL WITHDRAWAL SEVERITY

Kristine M. Wiren and Joel G. Hashimoto

Chronic alcohol (EtOH) abuse is an intractable problem. One defining aspect of drug dependence is the emergence and elaboration of a constellation of symptoms after the abrupt cessation of drug use, collectively termed withdrawal. The EtOH withdrawal syndrome reflects a state of neuronal hyperexcitability resulting from a variety of cellular adaptive responses to long‐term alcohol consumption, including changes in gene expression. The identification of gene “targets” that are altered by chronic EtOH administration will provide information about such neuroadaptive changes that may reflect or underlie physical dependence and relapse potential.

The role of gender (sex) in the transcriptional response following chronic EtOH exposure is poorly understood. The vast majority of studies looking at the transcriptional response to EtOH exposure have primarily focused on males with little or no mention of how the response may be similar or different in females. Interestingly, there is ample evidence in the literature to suggest that the responses of males and females to EtOH are different, and recently there has been increased focus on the implications of these findings (Hommer et al., 2001; Mann et al., 1992, 2005). Males and females demonstrate marked behavioral and physiological differences in response to alcohol. For example, women develop greater organ damage (EtOH‐induced cirrhosis, cardiomyopathy, and peripheral neuropathy) after fewer years of heavy drinking than do alcoholic men (Ammendola et al., 2000; Fernandez‐Sola and Nicolas‐Arfelis, 2002; Hommer, 2003; Loft et al., 1987; Urbano‐Marquez et al., 1995). However, women's sensitivity to EtOH‐induced brain damage remains controversial and understudied.

As the prefrontal cortex is part of the brain circuitry involved in EtOH withdrawal (physical dependence), is important in aspects of cognitive function, and finally is a site of damage and neurodegeneration in human alcoholics, we have compared the effects of withdrawal following chronic EtOH exposure on prefrontal cortex gene expression between male and female mice. We hypothesized that gender would influence the neuroadaptive responses to chronic EtOH exposure and withdrawal.

The selected lines used in this study were developed from heterogeneous stock (Hs/Ibg, 8‐way cross of inbred mouse lines) that exhibit enhanced or diminished withdrawal severity after chronic EtOH exposure (Crabbe et al., 1983, 1985). The Withdrawal Seizure‐Prone (WSP) and Withdrawal Seizure‐Resistant (WSR) selected lines were developed independently in replicate resulting in the WSP‐1, WSP‐2 and WSR‐1, WSR‐2 lines. Chronic continuous EtOH exposure was achieved with a vapor chamber inhalation procedure, which allowed for high blood EtOH concentration (BEC, ∼2.2–2.5 mg/ml) and temporally controlled withdrawal. The mice were 49 to 95 days old at the start of the experiments and were naïve to any drug exposure. Mice were separated into 2 treatment groups, air/pyrazole, the air control group, and EtOH/pyrazole. Pyrazole, an alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitor, was used to stabilize BECs. Following 72 hours of EtOH exposure, mice were removed from the chambers and allowed to proceed through 8 hours of withdrawal. Brains were harvested following euthanasia, and the prefrontal cortex was isolated by dissection. Using DNase‐treated total RNA isolated from the prefrontal cortex of 2 animals, a complex probe was produced by direct reverse transcription in the presence of [α33P‐dATP]. Following overnight hybridization, GF400 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) membranes were washed and exposed to phosphoimager screens. Clone intensities were analyzed using a phosphoimager and imported into Pathways software. Raw expression values were then exported, normalized, and analyzed using Vector Xpression 3.1 (Invitrogen). Briefly, each array was normalized using global z scores following Log2 transformation multiplied by 2 and added to 8 so that each array had a mean of 8, a variance of 4, and a standard deviation of 2. Differential regulation was determined by comparing groups in the following manner. Male WSR EtOH regulation was determined by comparing 4 WSR arrays from 8 male air‐exposed WSR mice to 4 WSR arrays from 8 male EtOH‐exposed WSR mice. Replicate lines were combined to identify withdrawal severity phenotype‐relevant changes, reduce the contribution of randomly fixed genes, and to increase statistical power. For cluster analysis, genes that were significant in one or more comparison were converted to z ratios.

Ethanol‐regulated genes from each comparison (Male WSR, Male WSP, Female WSR, Female WSP) were analyzed using Gene Ontology Tree Machine (GOTM; Zhang et al., 2004), Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID; Dennis et al., 2003), and Expression Analysis Systematic Explorer (EASE; Hosack et al., 2003). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis (average linkage clustering) was performed using the Euclidean distance metric, calculated in TMEV software (tigir.org) using z ratios.

A subset of expression differences identified in the array analysis were confirmed by real‐time RT‐PCR (qRT‐PCR). Relative expression was determined using the comparative ΔΔCt method (Winer et al., 1999), after normalizing expression with fluorescence to RiboGreen as described previously (Hashimoto et al., 2004). Real‐time qRT‐PCR efficiency was determined for each primer set using a 5‐fold dilution series of total RNA and did not differ significantly from 100%. Individual reaction kinetics were also analyzed to ensure that each qRT‐PCR did not differ significantly from 100%. Following PCR, the specificity of the PCR reaction was confirmed with melt curve analysis to ensure that only the expected PCR product was amplified per reaction.

We identified 295 EtOH‐regulated genes in one or more comparisons following 8 hours of withdrawal after chronic EtOH exposure. Several of these genes have been previously identified as influenced by EtOH exposure or in a variety of models of neurodegenerative diseases, including adenylate cyclase 7 and natural cytotoxicity triggering receptor 1 (Niemann‐Pick type C) Ncr1. Niemann‐Pick type C disease is an inherited lipid storage disorder with major neurological involvement that is characterized by progressive neurodegeneration.

Gene expression patterns were also analyzed by unsupervised hierarchical clustering. Interestingly, with replicates collapsed, overall gene expression differences from the arrays grouped clearly according to sex (male vs female) and not the withdrawal severity phenotype (WSP vs WSR). Bootstrap analysis using 100 iterations confirmed the overall tree topography at 100% support. These results provide evidence for a fundamental difference in the gene expression response to EtOH withdrawal between males and females, irrespective of the divergent behavioral responses during EtOH withdrawal exhibited by the WSP and WSR mouse lines.

Thus, the strongest influence on the gene expression response to chronic EtOH withdrawal was gender, not the selected phenotype. Gene ontology overrepresentation analysis in male WSP and WSR mice showed robust regulation of antiapoptotic and anti‐inflammatory genes and pathways influencing ubiquitination/protein catabolism, protein folding, secretion, and lipid metabolism. Analysis in female WSP and WSR mice showed significant regulation of pathways influencing DNA binding, transcription/translation, RNA editing, apoptosis/cell death, stimulation of gene expression in glia, and inflammation.

Confirmation of expression patterns identified by microarray analysis is a necessity. In males, we have confirmed regulation of Smad3 (both WSP and WSR), fractalkine (Cx3cl1) in WSR, and Hbxip in WSP by qRT‐PCR. Smad3 is known to bind androgen receptor (AR) and prevent signaling through AR, which has been shown to be important in excitotoxic damage (Rahman et al., 2004). Also, Smad3 inhibits Class II major histocompatibility complex expression, which would lead to an anti‐inflammatory response in the central nervous system (Dong et al., 2001). Down‐regulation of fractalkine in WSR males is interesting as fractalkine is a chemokine that aids in the infiltration of microglia as part of microglial activation following injury (Inoue et al., 2005; Nanki et al., 2004). Up‐regulation of Hbxip in WSP males is interesting as Hbxip forms a complex with survivin and binds pro‐caspase‐9, preventing the recruitment of caspase‐9 to Apaf1 and resulting in a suppression of apoptosis (Marusawa et al., 2003). In females, we have confirmed up‐regulation of Smac/DIABLO in WSP and Btf (Bclaf1) in WSR by qRT‐PCR. Both Smac/DIABLO and Btf participate in the apoptotic pathway and their up‐regulation would be consistent with a proapopototic state (Kasof et al., 1999). Although the same broad category is influenced in a sex‐specific fashion, the same genes are not necessarily regulated in the same fashion in both WSP and WSR.

Combined, these results indicate that chronic EtOH exposure/withdrawal differentially alters gene expression in the prefrontal cortex in mice, as has been previously described for human alcoholic individuals. As the prefrontal cortex is involved in executive function, disruption of the normal inhibitory functions (i.e., inhibition of unnecessary or unwanted behavior) may contribute to excessive drinking and the self‐sustaining nature of alcoholism. Notably, the present findings indicate that EtOH withdrawal influences gene expression in the prefrontal cortex with differences that reflect gender more than the selected EtOH withdrawal phenotype. Furthermore, the signaling pathways that are differentially affected suggest that females may have increased vulnerability for EtOH‐induced brain damage.

SEX DIFFERENCES IN ETHANOL WITHDRAWAL INVOLVE GABAERGIC AND STRESS SYSTEMS

Paul E. Alele and Leslie L. Devaud

Being female, rather than male, is an important context that needs to be recognized because an increasing body of evidence supports the existence of significant biological differences between men and women that impact health and disease, including alcoholism (Ashley et al., 1977; Matsumoto, 2000; Wizeman and Pardue, 2001). The underlying mechanisms for differences in risks for harm from various diseases between men and women likely involve hormonal influences, owing to the differing hormonal milieu between males and females. Animal models provide insights into human behaviors and health risks because these models allow us to study neurobiological and basic physiological contributions removed from societal and other environmental influences.

Sex differences in levels of gonadal steroid hormones (notably estrogens) occur early in development and continue throughout adulthood. As mentioned in the Introduction to this symposium, gonadal steroid organizational influences are prominent during development, resulting in structural and functional differences between the male and female brain. Conversely, activational influences involve actions of gonadal steroids present throughout youth and adulthood. At this point, it is largely unclear what role organizational and/or activational hormonal influences have on many of the health risks in men and women, including harm from alcohol.

Alcohol abuse and dependence are prevalent health concerns in our society (Alcohol and Health, 2000). Epidemiological studies have shown that women appear to have a greater initial sensitivity to the effects of EtOH than men and generally have a lower prevalence of alcohol abuse and dependence compared with men (Alcohol and Health, 2000). However, women who abuse alcohol or become dependent on it tend to undergo pathophysiological consequences of excessive consumption more quickly and at smaller doses than men (Ashley et al., 1977; Schenker, 1997), including a greater impact on brain morphology and function (Mann et al., 1992, 2005; Pfefferbaum et al., 2001; Schweinsburg et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2003). An important question raised by these findings is to what extent do gender differences in alcohol abuse and dependence involve inherent neurobiological underpinnings. We hypothesize that innate sex differences in brain structure and function influence responses to chronic EtOH exposure and withdrawal.

Our lab research is currently focused on exploring sex differences in responses of EtOH withdrawal. There are many negative symptoms of EtOH withdrawal, including agitation, anxiety, insomnia, dysphoria, and tremors. In severe withdrawal, tremors can lead to seizures and these seizures may be life‐threatening. The severity and extent of withdrawal symptoms are believed to make a significant contribution to risk for relapse in recovering alcoholic individuals. Moreover, a recent study found that male alcoholic patients displayed more EtOH withdrawal symptoms than female alcoholic patients, even when matched for history of EtOH consumption (Deshmukh et al., 2003). These findings have led to our exploration of neurobiological contributions to sex differences in EtOH dependence and withdrawal.

We used an animal model of dependence and withdrawal, young adult Sprague‐Dawley rats. We now routinely use 3 sex conditions: males, intact females, and ovariectomized (OVX) females. Rats were made to become dependent on EtOH by administration of 6% EtOH in a nutritionally complete liquid diet for 14 to 16 days. Paired control animals were provided the same liquid diet, with dextrose substituted isocalorically for EtOH to provide equivalent caloric intake. To study EtOH withdrawal, the liquid diet was replaced with lab chow and animals were tested at various time points of withdrawal. Estrus cyclicity was monitored daily in the intact female rats by histological examination of vaginal smears. Test days were scheduled for when females are in estrus or diestrus I. In general, female rats tend to largely synchronize cycles within the time frame of the experiment and often show a prolonged estrus stage.

We used both behavioral and neurochemical assays to assess sex differences in the effects of EtOH withdrawal. These included behavioral tests of seizure risk in which we administered a convulsant drug, bicuculline or pentylenetetrazol, by the intravenous route (Devaud and Chadda, 2001; Devaud et al., 2003, 1995). Neurochemical assays included radioligand‐binding analysis, γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABAA) receptor–mediated chloride flux measurements, and Western blotting focused on identification of changes in subunit levels of GABAA receptors and the N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate (NMDA) subtype of glutamate receptors. Our experiments have targeted GABAergic and glutamatergic systems as extensive evidence shows a critical role of these 2 systems in mediation of responses to EtOH. Ethanol consumption tilts the balance toward central nervous system depression through enhancement of GABAergic neurotransmission and inhibition of glutamatergic neurotransmission (see Crews et al., 1996; Grobin et al., 1998, for review).

To date, we have found consistent sex and brain‐region selective differences in the expression of GABAA and NMDA receptor subunit protein levels occurring with EtOH dependence (Devaud and Alele, 2004; Devaud and Morrow, 1999). Of special interest was the correlation between increased levels of GABAA receptor α4 subunit protein in the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus with behavioral expression of EtOH dependence and withdrawal. The α4 subunit protein remained elevated in male, but not female, rats through 3 days of EtOH withdrawal. A number of investigators have provided evidence for associations between elevations in α4 subunit–containing GABAA receptors and alterations in activation of this receptor, further implicating α4‐containing GABAA receptors as having a role in increased anxiety and seizure risk (e.g., see Cagetti et al., 2003; Smith et al., 1998; Smith and Gong, 2004; Sundstrom‐Poromaa et al., 2002). There were also sex‐ and region‐selective alterations in subunit levels for NMDA receptors occurring with EtOH dependence, with the functional significance of these sex‐selective responses being less clear. Moreover, there were chronic EtOH‐induced changes in levels of various other proteins involved in GABAergic and glutamatergic transmission that were also sex‐ and region‐selective, providing further support of a neurobiological bases for sex differences in chronic EtOH‐induced alterations in neurotransmission (Alele and Devaud, 2005a; Devaud, 2001).

In earlier sets of behavioral studies, ovariectomy did not alter the consistently observed increased seizure susceptibility of EtOH withdrawal, with OVX females having patterns similar to those of intact females, for both control and EtOH‐withdrawn groups (Devaud et al., 2000). We also found that ovariectomy had minimal effects on chronic EtOH‐induced alterations in GABAA and NMDA receptor subunit levels or in GABA and glutamate transporter levels or function (Devaud, 2001). This supports our hypothesis that innate differences in brain structure and function provide a neurobiological basis for observed sex differences in response to EtOH.

We continued to explore sex differences in EtOH withdrawal behaviors by measuring seizure risk at early (24 hours) or later (3 day) time points of withdrawal. Male and female rats showed a reliable reduction in seizure threshold (increased seizure susceptibility) at 24 hours of withdrawal compared with control susceptibilities. In contrast, there was a consistent and robust sex difference in seizure susceptibility at 3 days of withdrawal, with female rats appearing largely recovered but male rats continuing to show significantly increased seizure susceptibility. More recently, we observed significant sex differences in seizure activity following a bolus injection of pentylenetetrazol (Alele and Devaud, 2005b). There were important sex differences between control sex groups (males, intact females, and OVX females) as well as at 24 hours and 3 days of EtOH withdrawal. Consistent with earlier reports, we observed greater sensitivity to the anticonvulsant effects of the neuroactive steroid, pregnanolone, by female rats during early withdrawal (Devaud et al., 1995; Devaud and Morrow, 1999). Furthermore, intact female, but not male, rats displayed tolerance to the anticonvulsant effect of pregnanolone at 3 days of EtOH withdrawal. Male and OVX female rats remained sensitized at this time. These data suggest that activational influences of gonadal steroids also exert effects on responses to EtOH.

In summary, brain adaptations that occur during recovery from EtOH withdrawal are multifaceted. Our findings suggest that the precise sequelae of events vary by sex and arise from both organizational and activational influences. These findings provide additional support for an important role of GABAergic adaptations as part of the EtOH withdrawal process. It is clear that recovery from EtOH withdrawal involves more than a simple “resetting” back to basal conditions, highlighting the context‐dependent nature of responses to EtOH. The more we look, the more we find important sex differences in risk for and responses to a number of disorders, including alcoholism and alcohol withdrawal. Continued exploration of sex‐selective responses to pharmacological management of alcohol withdrawal should help identify new approaches for improved treatment according to gender and hormonal status.

THE INFLUENCE OF SEX ON ETHANOL CONSUMPTION AND REWARD IN C57BL/6 MICE

Kimber L. Price and Lawrence D. Middaugh

The use of laboratory animals in experimental preclinical research may provide information on the impact of sexually divergent biological influences on both the physiological and rewarding effects of alcohol. Rodents have been used extensively in preclinical alcohol studies and have recently been examined to model the sex differences in alcohol use seen in humans. However, in addition to the sex influence, physiological responses to alcohol in rodents vary according to species and/or strain in ways that may or not correlate with human sex differences. For example, hepatic alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) levels differ across 7 strains of mice, with varying degrees and direction of sexual dimorphism (Rao et al., 1997) and unlike what has been reported in humans (Baraona et al., 2001), female C57BL/6 (B6) mice exhibited higher ADH activity than their male counterparts (Rao et al., 1997). As has been shown for humans (Mumenthaler et al., 1999), female rats reportedly have higher blood EtOH levels (BELs) and faster elimination rates than males (Erickson, 1984); BEL differences reported for male and female mice are contradictory (Crippens et al., 1999; Hutchins et al., 1981; Middaugh et al., 1992; Seitz et al., 1992).

Behavioral responses to alcohol reward also vary according to sex, and the results fluctuate between species and experimental conditions as well. Human studies have shown that males typically drink more alcohol than females, but preclinical research has more frequently shown the opposite in rodents, with females drinking more than males. Since the use of rodents as subjects in preclinical alcohol studies is likely to continue, attention should be paid to the conditions that may influence the degree to which an animal model may mimic what is seen in humans. Experimental procedural variables likely contribute to whether (and in which direction) sex differences in EtOH‐related behavior are observed, and should therefore be considered when animal models are used. For instance, the influence of sex on EtOH consumption may be impacted by the following: (1) EtOH dose or concentration, (2) test duration, (3) circadian factors, (4) behavioral economy, and (5) motivational variables. Two common measures of EtOH reward have been used in our laboratory to examine the potential influence of sex on EtOH reward in C57BL/6 (B6) mice, free‐access EtOH consumption and oral EtOH operant reinforcement.

Free‐Access EtOH Consumption. In free‐access consumption studies (Middaugh et al., 1999), mice are given limited (30–60 min/d) or continuous (20–24 h/d) 2‐bottle choice between water and an EtOH solution in their home cages. During continuous access to water and EtOH (3% or 10%) solutions, females consistently had higher total fluid (μL/g body weight) intake than males. When given the choice between water and 3% EtOH, EtOH consumption was similar for both sexes, but water intake was higher in females. When given water and a 10% EtOH solution, however, males consumed similar levels of both fluids, while females drank significantly more from the EtOH solution than water. Therefore, females derived 33% of their total daily fluid from the 3% EtOH when it was available and 69% from the 10% EtOH solution, whereas intake did not vary across solutions (water or EtOH) or concentrations (3% vs 10% EtOH) for males. These results suggest that preference for stronger EtOH solutions may be greater for females than males, or that females are better able to discriminate the taste of EtOH than males.

In contrast to the continuous access results, under limited‐access conditions, intake of either the 3% or 10% EtOH solutions did not differ for the 2 sexes. Although males and females consumed similar amounts of 12% EtOH during limited‐access tests, females had 22% higher BELs than did males. The limited‐access tests were conducted during the light phase of the light‐dark cycle. To assess the influence of circadian factors on sex differences in EtOH intake, animals were given access to water and EtOH solutions for 60 minutes during the dark phase for comparison. In these tests, intake of 10% EtOH did not change according to light cycle for males, but increased significantly during the dark phase for females. Therefore, circadian factors seem to have a greater influence on EtOH consumption in females than in males.

Sex differences were also noted in the intake of EtOH solutions across days of EtOH exposure. Given 30 days of continuous access to water and 10% EtOH, males consumed similar amounts of each solution during the early (days 7 and 8), middle (days 17 and 18), and late (days 27 and 28) phases of exposure to EtOH; in contrast, females increased the volume of EtOH consumed and decreased water intake across days. This sex difference can be interpreted as a compensatory increase in intake because of a more rapid development of tolerance in females. Alternatively, it is also possible that males adapt more rapidly to having EtOH available.

Operant EtOH Reinforcement. Consumption characteristics for EtOH following appetitive responses differ from those associated with free access, and instrumental contingencies can also influence whether EtOH reward and consumption differ according to sex. Ethanol reward is influenced by the response demands associated with obtaining the drug, as well as whether the tests occur with or without the additional motivations of hunger or thirst. Basic operant techniques were used to assess the influence of sex on the acquisition and maintenance of EtOH operant reward under variable operant test conditions.

Although the acquisition of lever‐pressing behavior is commonly used to assess reward value for drugs of abuse, this is not common for EtOH studies. In recent unpublished studies in our lab that included male and female mice, however, it was noted that the acquisition of lever‐pressing behavior was more problematic for females than for males. With animals food restricted and motivated by thirst (postprandial testing), male mice readily acquired lever responding for water reward (<1 week of daily testing). Under the same conditions, however, >50% of females did not meet acquisition criteria (10 lever responses) and required additional training. Shaping procedures were used in which lever extenders of diminishing lengths were used for an additional 8 days of twice‐daily testing. On the 16th day of testing, all animals of both sexes met acquisition criteria. In a second experiment in which animals were not food restricted, acquisition of lever‐pressing behavior for a sweetened EtOH solution (0.2% saccharin/12% EtOH) also required the use of supplemental training with lever extenders in more than half of the females. A similar finding was reported for female rats acquiring lever‐pressing behavior for a sweetened EtOH solution (Roberts et al., 1998). Therefore, although the literature contains several studies reporting more rapid acquisition of lever‐pressing behavior in females for other drugs of abuse (Lynch et al., 2002), there may be a learning‐related difference between males and females in associating lever‐pressing behavior (an appetitive response) with intake of oral reinforcers (a consumatory response).

Although slower to acquire lever‐pressing behavior, females responded more than males for 12% EtOH if the reinforcement schedules were not behaviorally demanding [e.g., fixed ratio (FR)1‐FR4]. This tendency was observed in food‐restricted animals tested preprandially (hunger‐motivated) and postprandially (thirst‐motivated), as well as in animals with no dietary restrictions imposed. EtOH reward concentration curves revealed that both sexes responded more for higher (12%–15%) than for lower (3%–9%) concentrations of EtOH or for water on an FR4 schedule of reinforcement. Additional tests examined the impact of more demanding operant schedules (e.g., FR8 or progressive ratio; PR) and reductions in reward access time on sex differences in EtOH reward (Middaugh and Kelley, 1999). When the reinforcement schedule was increased to FR8 (10 seconds access time), lever responding increased with increased concentrations of EtOH, and females responded more than males. Reductions in the reward access period times (10–5 or 3 seconds) also generally increased lever responses; both sexes responded more for EtOH than water when given 5 seconds of access to the reward, but only the males increased responding for EtOH when access to the reward was restricted to 3 seconds. Lever responses increased substantially when rewards were delivered on a PR2 schedule of reinforcement when compared with the FR8 schedule in males but not in females. Thus, females tended to respond more for EtOH solutions when the instrumental response contingency was lower and access was longer, whereas males responded more when behavioral demands were higher and access time was shorter. Therefore, as the reward cost increased, EtOH remained an effective reinforcer for males but not females, suggesting that the reward value of EtOH may be greater for male than for female mice. One may speculate that these parameters more closely reflect the behavioral economy conditions under which humans consume alcohol, where females may tend to drink less alcohol because the “cost” is higher on some level—personal, societal, etc.

In summary, sex differences do exist in alcohol reward and vary according to species and/or strain. Our studies suggest that examination of the influence of sex on EtOH‐related behaviors requires attention to subtle parameters of experimental design that can influence the direction as well as the degree to which sex differences in EtOH reward are expressed.

SEX DIFFERENCES IN ALCOHOL SELF‐ADMINISTRATION IN CYNOMOLGUS MONKEYS

Kathleen A. Grant

Fundamental questions in the study of alcoholism and alcohol abuse revolve around the biological predisposition to drink excessive amounts of alcohol and the physiological adaptations that contribute to repeated intoxications. These questions are difficult to answer in humans for logistical, ethical, and financial reasons, as well as subject bias in self‐reporting alcohol consumption. Alternatives to these problems exist in a variety of animal models with predictive validity toward one correlate of alcoholism and utilize either invertebrates, mice, rats, gerbils, guinea pigs, pigeons, dogs, pigs, or monkeys. Nonhuman primates afford the opportunity to assess the relevance of findings from species such as rodents because nonhuman primate physiology and behavior more closely resemble human physiological responses to alcohol abuse and alcoholism. Macaque monkeys have many characteristics that make them useful for EtOH research. They have greater than 95% gene homology with humans, similar comparative anatomy and physiology, similar lengths and patterns of gonadotropin and sex steroid secretion, and similar absorption and metabolism of EtOH (see Grant and Bennett, 2003). In addition, macaques use complex social relationships and have the capacity for complex cognitive function. Perhaps most significant to alcohol research, macaques have the propensity to self‐administer large quantities of EtOH orally.

Investigations of oral EtOH self‐administration in nonhuman primates have revealed important parallels with human alcohol use and abuse. For example, between 15 and 20% of vervet and rhesus monkeys drink EtOH in amounts significantly greater than the amounts in their respective cohorts, with intakes exceeding 3 g/kg/d in monkeys identified as EtOH‐preferring (Ervin et al., 1990; Higley et al., 1996). Not surprisingly, BEC is correlated with EtOH intake, and the heaviest drinking monkeys attain BECs greater than 100 mg/dL (Vivian et al., 1999). These findings were obtained with monkeys in a variety of environmental contexts, suggesting that proportions of nonhuman primates are susceptible to biological factors, including genetics, which may result in heavy EtOH consumption. In addition, the proportion of monkeys that self‐administer excessive amounts of EtOH actually exceeds the 3% to 10% lifetime prevalence of alcoholism in humans (O'Brien, 1996), an observation that suggests that nonhuman primates may be particularly valuable in research on the susceptibility to alcoholism.

We have developed a method that exposes a population of male and female cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) to EtOH while allowing for extreme control over intake measures. A population of 9 adult male and 9 adult female monkeys were induced to self‐administer EtOH (4% w/v) as described in Vivian et al. The monkeys were induced to consume water and then EtOH (4% w/v) under a fixed‐time (FT) schedule of pellet delivery (i.e., schedule‐induced polydipsia; Falk, 1961) in 16‐hour sessions. The amount of EtOH induced each day increased in a stepwise fashion over 30‐day epochs. Specifically, monkeys were induced to drink EtOH 0.5 g/kg/d (2–3 drinks) for 30 consecutive days, 1 g/kg/day (4–5 drinks) for 30 consecutive days, and finally 1.5 g/kg day (6–7 drinks) for 30 consecutive days. The purpose of this regimen of EtOH exposure was to avoid conditioned taste aversions by limiting the amount of EtOH the monkeys could drink upon their initial exposures and to induce all animals to drink the same amount of alcohol in a similar amount of time. By inducing the consumption of EtOH over a short period of time (1–2 hours), the schedule also optimized the learned association between EtOH and the experience of intoxication.

After completion of the induction phase, the FT schedule of pellet delivery was discontinued. Concurrent EtOH and water became available continuously during daily 16‐hour sessions for 3 months. The daily sessions were then extended to 22 hours for 3 additional months. The monkeys were then placed in 12 months of abstinence and then allowed access to EtOH, water, and food for 22 h/d for 18 months. Thus, following the induction of EtOH self‐administration, the monkeys had a total of 24 months in which they could choose to drink unlimited amounts of EtOH or water each day. During the course of the experiments, sex and individual differences in EtOH intake became apparent. The males as a group consistently drank more EtOH than females, resulting in mean daily intakes of 2.6±0.3 g/kg/d (10–12 drinks) and 1.7±0.3 g/kg/d (approximately 7–8 drinks), respectively. Using the daily EtOH intakes, EtOH consumption was normally distributed in males. The female distribution of daily EtOH intake was positively skewed, with a greater likelihood of sessions with lower EtOH consumption (<1.0 g/kg/d; approximately 4 drinks).

Blood samples were taken 8 hours after the beginning of the session every fifth day during the 16‐ to 22‐hour sessions (over 500 samples were obtained and analyzed). Although EtOH intakes varied across monkeys, BEC was linearly and positively correlated with EtOH intake [sexes combined (r(505)=0.77, p<0.01)]. Similarly, in all but 1 monkey (monkey 5496), individual correlations of BEC and g/kg EtOH intake were significant (r2 range 0.4–0.91; p<0.05). The BECs attained in the males were higher than in the female monkeys. It should be noted that BECs in the male population were frequently above 100 mg/mL and often in the 200 to 400 mg/dL range (Vivian et al., 2001). These data are, to our knowledge, the highest BEC levels consistently obtained in an oral EtOH self‐administration procedure with monkeys and highlight the probability that physiological and neurobiological adaptations will occur in response to these EtOH intakes.

Important to the documentation of sex differences in the self‐administration of EtOH and subsequent BEC measurements is the metabolic rate of EtOH by the cynomolgus monkey. We conducted an extensive study of both sex and menstrual cycle phase on the metabolism of EtOH in cynomolgus monkeys (Green et al., 1999). In this study, we measured peak EtOH concentrations (60 minutes postgavage) and EtOH elimination rates (over a 5‐hour period) in EtOH‐experienced male (n=4) and female (n=4) monkeys gavaged with 1.0 g/kg EtOH (15% w/v). There were no sex differences in peak BEC levels 60 minutes following gavage (male 86±2 mg/dL; female 82±5 mg/dL). These are similar levels as reported for social drinkers that range from 90 to 128 mg/dL after drinking 0.85 to 1.0 g/kg EtOH. The lack of a gender difference in peak BEC probably reflects the relatively lean body weights of our female monkeys (10%–15%) compared with women subjects, where body fat can range from 5% to 50%. As men are generally leaner than women and EtOH is more soluble in water than fat, EtOH would be expected to be a higher concentration in the blood (water compartment) in a woman when compared with a man.

In contrast to peak BEC, we did find that female monkeys have a faster EtOH elimination rate (34±2 mg/dL/h) than male monkeys (23±1 mg/dL/h). There are reports of women having faster EtOH elimination rates, particularly when doses are given that produce BEC of 80 to 90 mg/dL (reviewed in Green et al., 1999). Ethanol elimination rates in the male monkeys match very well the elimination rates in male alcoholic subjects (Majchrowicz and Mendelson, 1970), but in general the rates were higher in our monkeys than in nonalcoholic subjects. The ranges of elimination rates in human subject studies range from 8 to 36 mg/dL/h (Jones, 1993). This wide range indicates that EtOH elimination rates are highly variable in humans. Even when studied in the same individuals under the same experimental conditions, the correlation between test–retest elimination rates are poor (r=0.42–0.55) (Thomasson, 1995; Wilson and Erwin, 1983). Overall, the EtOH elimination rates found with cynomolgus monkeys are certainly within the range reported for human subjects.

One aspect of EtOH self‐administration that became apparent in the course of these experiments is the effect on the menstrual cycle. Menstrual cycle quality was assessed in female cynomolgus monkeys with serum progesterone levels taken every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and by counting the length of the menstrual cycle based on daily swabs of the vaginal area. We determined luteal phase serum progesterone concentrations 3 times per week as an indicator of ovulation and cycle phase. Peak luteal phase progesterone concentrations less than 2.0 ng/mL indicated an anovulatory cycle, whereas peak luteal phase progesterone concentrations that fell between 2.0 and 4.0 ng/mL might be considered indicative of luteal phase deficiency, and progesterone concentrations above 5 ng/mL are indicative of ovulation (Wilks et al., 1979).

Ethanol self‐administration altered menstrual cycle quality, as reflected in a dose‐related suppression in luteal phase progesterone concentrations. Indeed, impairment was apparent after drinking 1.0 g/kg/d EtOH and anovulation, indicated by severe suppression of progesterone concentrations, was apparent with intakes over 1.5 g/kg EtOH. Progesterone concentrations and EtOH intakes were analyzed statistically by calculating the progesterone area under the curve (AUC) during a menstrual cycle and the corresponding EtOH intake (in g/kg) AUC for the corresponding day of the menstrual cycle. In the 8 monkeys over the 2‐year time frame we had corresponding data from 143 cycles (a maximum of 25 cycles in any single subject). We found that alcohol intake was highly associated with progesterone levels (AUC) with a p value of <0.0001 and also with an increase in cycle length (p<0.0003). We also investigated whether luteal phase progesterone sensitivity to EtOH during the induction phase was significantly related to menstrual cycle disruption during self‐administration following the induction phase. We found that while sensitivity on its own was not a significant predictor of decreased progesterone levels, there was a significant interaction between average alcohol intake and monkey sensitivity in addition to the significant main effect of average alcohol intake. Finally, the data analyses found that progesterone levels recovered after 9 months (3 months induction, 6 months open access) of EtOH self‐administration, when the monkeys were in 12 months of forced abstinence (p<0.02).

These disruptions in ovarian progesterone concentrations in heavier‐drinking females are consistent with disruptions of reproductive function observed under short‐term studies in rhesus monkeys and women (LaPaglia et al., 1997; Littleton, 1995; Mendelson and Mello, 1988). Furthermore, EtOH‐induced decreases in progesterone and estrogen would be predicted to have a negative impact on heart and cognitive function in addition to the direct effects of EtOH. Our model allows a unique characterization of these sex‐based effects of chronic EtOH self‐administration.

SIGNIFICANCE

Recent clinical data are consistent with the notion that women are more vulnerable than men to alcohol‐induced brain damage (Hommer, 2003; Mann et al., 2005) in spite of having less severe symptoms of alcohol withdrawal (Deshmukh et al., 2003) and a lower lifetime prevalence of alcohol abuse (Alcohol and Health, 2000). The first 2 presentations highlight preclinical studies demonstrating sex differences in chronic EtOH‐ and withdrawal‐induced molecular and neurochemical changes. Somewhat surprisingly, after the induction of physical dependence on alcohol in a mouse model of alcohol withdrawal severity, analysis at peak withdrawal identified significant alterations in the expression of gene networks that varied by sex, rather than withdrawal severity phenotype (K. M. Wiren and J. G. Hashimoto). The differential activation of specific gene networks provides a potential neurobiological mechanism for significant gender differences in neurodegenerative responses and indicate that females may demonstrate enhanced brain damage as a consequence of alcohol abuse. Use of a different model of physical dependence indicated that male and female rats displayed a different time course for the development of, and recovery from, behavioral symptoms of alcohol withdrawal that were accompanied by sex differences in neurochemical and molecular adaptations (P. Alele and L. L. Devaud). The second 2 presentations highlight preclinical studies demonstrating sex differences in alcohol self‐administration in mice and monkeys. In the alcohol‐preferring C57BL/6 mouse strain, male and female mice differed on measures of EtOH consumption. These studies describe how procedural variables may influence whether, and in which direction, sex differences are observed (K. L. Price and L. D. Middaugh). In cynomolgus monkeys allowed to selfadminister alcohol for over 18 months, male monkeys consumed a higher dose of EtOH whereas the female monkeys appeared to be more sensitive to the toxic effects of EtOH (K.A. Grant).

In summary, the results of this symposium underscore the importance of both recognizing and examining sex differences in models of alcohol neuroadaptation and reinforcement. The results also hint at the complex interaction between circulating steroid levels (including sex steroids) and measures of alcohol sensitivity and neuroadaptation, as well as the impact of high chronic alcohol intake on endogenous steroid levels. Future studies should attempt to examine how alterations in hormonal, neurochemical, and neurodegenerative pathways contribute to the differential expression of chronic alcohol‐induced complications in both men and women. Therefore, while the results of this symposium indicate that gender has an important role in influencing responses to the effects of EtOH, additional studies will need to be undertaken to examine differences in treatment response by gender.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.