Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnitah, Nakavuma
dc.contributor.authorAfrika, Musau Immanuel
dc.contributor.authorHassan, Lumu
dc.contributor.authorRose, Atimaaku Palma
dc.contributor.authorEvalyne, Ankunda
dc.contributor.authorBosco, Agaba
dc.contributor.authorBenson, Okongo
dc.contributor.authorRogers, Kalyetsi
dc.contributor.authorFrank, Ssendyabane
dc.contributor.authorEnock, Muwanguzi
dc.contributor.authorBagenda, Charles Nkubi
dc.contributor.authorRugera, Simon Peter
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-20T12:29:24Z
dc.date.available2024-02-20T12:29:24Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-13
dc.identifier.citationAnitah, N., Afrika, M. I., Hassan, L., Rose, A. P., & Evalyne, A. (2024). HRP2 and PLDH Performance Comparison as Rapid Diagnostic Tools for Symptomatic Malaria Patients at Rugazi HC IV in Rubirizi District. Int J Med Net, 2(2), 01-14.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/3394
dc.description.abstractBackground: Rapid and precise laboratory diagnosis is essential for effectively diagnosing and managing malaria patients. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) play a critical role in malaria diagnosis in resource-constrained settings with limited access to labs and trained staff. The efficiency of two mRDTs (HRP2 and pLDH) was compared against microscopy, the gold standard for malaria diagnosis, in this study. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 308 participants were tested for malaria parasites using two mRDTs and blood smear microscopy as the gold standard. STATA software version 17 was used for data analysis. Results: Out of the 308 participants, 82 tested positive for HRP2 mRDT (26.62% (95% CI: 21.97-31.86) positivity rate, 73.38% (95% CI: 68.14-78.83) negativity rate), and 99 tested positive for pLDH mRDT (32.14% (95% CI: 27.14-37.59) positivity rate, 67.86% (95% CI: 62.41-72.86) negativity rate). Using microscopy as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were determined. For HRP2 mRDT, sensitivity was 77.78% (95%CI: 73.13-82.42), specificity 97.61% (95%CI: 95.90 - 99.31), PPV 93.90% (95%CI: 91.23 – 96.56), and NPV 90.27% (95%CI: 86.96-93.58). For pLDH mRDT, the sensitivity was 94.95% (95% CI: 92.50-97.40), specificity was 97.61% (95% CI: 95.90-99.31), PPV was 94.95% (95% CI: 92.50 – 97.40), and NPV was 97.61% (95% CI: 95.90 - 99.31). The dominant malaria species was Plasmodium falciparum (74.7%), followed by Plasmodium vivax (12.1%) and Plasmodium ovale (1%). Mixed infections of plasmodium falciparum and plasmodium vivax (7.1%) and plasmodium falciparum and plasmodium ovale (5.1%) were also observed. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the positivity rate, negativity rate, specificity or PPV in both mRDTs. However, a significant difference in the NPV and sensitivity of HRP2 and pLDH mRDTs was observed where HRP2’s sensitivity was below the WHO recommendation of ≥95% in this study population; thus, there is a need to improve the sensitivity of this mRDT kit. In our study, most malaria infections were caused by Plasmodium falciparum, followed by P. vivax and P. ovale.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInternational Internal Medicine Journalen_US
dc.subjectMalaria Rapid Diagnostic Testsen_US
dc.subjectMalaria Microscopyen_US
dc.subjectSymptomatic Infectionsen_US
dc.titleHRP2 and PLDH Performance Comparison as Rapid Diagnostic Tools for Symptomatic Malaria Patients at Rugazi HC IV in Rubirizi Districten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record