Chemometric Classification of Mangifera indica L. Leaf Cultivars, Based on Selected Phytochemical Parameters; Implications for Standardization of the Pharmaceutical Raw Materials
![Thumbnail](/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/3082/Chemometric%20Classification%20of%20Mangifera%20indica%20L.%20Leaf%20Cultivars%2c%20Based%20on%20Selected%20Phytochemical%20Parameters-implications%20for%20Standardization%20of%20the%20Pharmaceutical%20Raw%20Materials.pdf.jpg?sequence=4&isAllowed=y)
View/ Open
Date
2023Author
Kaggwa, Bruhan
Nakayita, Maria Gloria
Munanura, Edson Ireeta
Kyeyune, Henry
Ajayi, Clement Olusoji
Wangalwa, Raphael
Walakira, Daniel Pillah
Anywar, Godwin
Bagoloire, Lynn K.
Kakazi, Teddy
Ddamulira, Gabriel
Kamba, Fadhiru Pakoyo
Ogwang, Patrick Engeu
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Introduction: Mangifera indica leaves are among the most common materials employed in manufacturing herbal medicinal products. Despite the phytochemical variation of M. indica cultivars, there are no monographs to guide the cultivation, processing, and authentication of the materials.
Methods: This study characterized 15 Ugandan M. indica leaf varieties, with reference to extraction index (EI), total phenolic content (TPC), antioxidant activity (AOA), and mangiferin concentration (MC). In addition, HPLC fingerprints were established to evaluate the overall phytoequivalence of the materials. Then, using hierarchical clustering (HC) and principal component analysis (PCA), the materials were assigned quality grades.
Results: The mean EI was 9.39 ± 1.64% and varied among the varieties (P � 0.001); the TPC varied significantly (P < 0.0001), from 183.29 ± 2.36 mg/g (Takataka) to 79.47 ± 0.58 mg/g (Apple mango). AOA ranged from 16.81 ± 2.85 6g/mL (Doodo red) to 87.85 6g/mL (Asante). MC varied
significantly (P < 0.0001), from 105.75 ± 0.60 mg/g (Kate) to 39.53 ± 0.30 mg/g (Asante). HC gave four major grades: A to D (A, varieties with the highest TPC, MC, and AOA). These parameters reduced to below average from group B to group D. The chromatographic fingerprints were visually similar, but the number of peaks varied, from 19 (Kawanda green) to 29 (Kawanda wide), with 23.5 ± 2.9 average peaks. Whole fingerprints were less similar (r < 0.8) than common peak fingerprints (r > 0.9, P < 0.001). PCA grouped the fingerprints into five clusters; loading plots for PC 1 and 2 revealed two important compounds, one at Rt = 15.828 minutes (mangiferin) and the other at 6.021 minutes. Using the standardized common; fingerprints, unknown field samples clustered closely with Koona, Kate, and Kawanda green varieties.
Conclusions: The EI, TPC, MC, and AOA values can be utilized to monitor consistency in the quality of materials and the production process. The grades generated can be used to select materials for cultivation and manufacturing. Where minimum concentrations are set, materials of different concentrations are used to dilute or concentrate each other. The HPLC fingerprints can be utilized to authenticate the materials. More samples from different agroecological regions of the country should be tested to cater to climatic variations in order to develop GMP-compliant botanical identification methods.
Collections
- Research Articles [36]