Evaluation of a point-of-care immunoassay test kit `StrongStep' for cryptococcal antigen detection
View/ Open
Date
2018Author
Mpoza, Edward
Mukaremera, Liliane
Kundura, Didas Atwebembere
Akampurira, Andrew
Luggya, Tonny
Tadeo, Kiiza Kandole
Pastick, Katelyn A.
Bridge, Sarah C.
Tugume, Lillian
Kiggundu, Reuben
Musubire, Abdu K.
Williams, Darlisha A.
Muzoora, Conrad
Nalintya, Elizabeth
Rajasingham, Radha
Rhein, Joshua
Boulware, David R.
Meya, David B.
Abassi, Mahsa
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis is the leading cause of adult meningitis in Sub- Saharan Africa, accounting for 15%±20% of AIDS-attributable mortality. The development of point-of-care assays has greatly improved the screening and diagnosis of cryptococcal disease. We evaluated a point-of-care immunoassay, StrongStep (Liming Bio, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China) lateral flow assay (LFA), for cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) detection in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma.
Methods: We retrospectively tested 143 CSF and 77 plasma samples collected from HIV-seropositive individuals with suspected meningitis from 2012±2016 in Uganda. We prospectively tested 90 plasma samples collected from HIV-seropositive individuals with CD4 cell count <100
cells/μL from 2016±2017 as part of a cryptococcal antigenemia screening program. The StrongStep CrAg was tested against a composite reference standard of positive Immy CrAg LFA (Immy, Norman, OK, USA) or CSF culture with statistical comparison by McNemar's test.
Results: StrongStep CrAg had a 98% (54/55) sensitivity and 90% (101/112) specificity in plasma (P = 0.009, versus reference standard). In CSF, the StrongStep CrAg had 100% (101/101) sensitivity and 98% (41/42) specificity (P = 0.99). Adjusting for the cryptococcal antigenemia prevalence of 9% in Uganda and average cryptococcal meningitis prevalence of 37% in Sub-Saharan Africa, the positive predictive value of the StrongStep CrAg was 50% in plasma and 96% in CSF
Conclusions: We found the StrongStep CrAg LFA to be a sensitive assay, which unfortunately lacked specificity in plasma. In lower prevalence settings, a majority of positive results from blood
would be expected to be false positives.
Collections
- Research Articles [256]