Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMulisya, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Drucilla J.
dc.contributor.authorSengupta, Elizabeth S.
dc.contributor.authorAgaba, Elly
dc.contributor.authorLaffita, Damaris
dc.contributor.authorTobias, Tusabe
dc.contributor.authorMpiima, Derrick Paul
dc.contributor.authorHenry, Lugobe
dc.contributor.authorAugustine, Ssemujju
dc.contributor.authorAbraham, Masinda
dc.contributor.authorHillary, Twizerimana
dc.contributor.authorMugisha, Julius
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-22T08:09:10Z
dc.date.available2022-07-22T08:09:10Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationMulisya, O., Roberts, D. J., Sengupta, E. S., Agaba, E., Laffita, D., Tobias, T., ... & Mugisha, J. (2018). Prevalence and factors associated with hydatidiform mole among patients undergoing uterine evacuation at mbarara regional referral hospital. Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2018.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/2270
dc.description.abstractObjective: We sought to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with hydatidiform molar gestations amongst patients undergoing uterine evacuation at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH), Mbarara, Uganda. Methods: This was a crosssectional study carried out from November 2016 to February 2017. All patients admitted for uterine evacuation for nonviable pregnancy were included. 'e study registered 181 patients. Data were collected on socio demographics, medical conditions, obstetrics, and gynecological factors. 'e evacuated tissue received a full gross and histopathologic examination. Cases of pathologically suspected complete hydatidiform mole were confirmed by p57 immunohistochemistry. Data were analyzed using STATA 13. Results: The prevalence of hydatidiform mole was 6.1% (11/181). All detected moles were complete hydatidiform moles, and there were no diagnosed partial hydatidiform moles. Clinical diagnosis of molar pregnancy was suspected in 13 patients, but only 69.2% (9/13) were confirmed as molar pregnancies histologically. Two cases were clinically unsuspected. Factors that had a significant relationship with complete hydatidiform mole included maternal age of 35 years and above (aOR 13.5; CI: 1.46–125.31; p � 0.00), gestational age beyond the first trimester at the time of uterine evacuation (aOR 6.2; CI: 1.07–36.14; p � 0.04), and history of previous abortion (aOR 4.3; CI: 1.00–18.57; p � 0.05). Conclusion: The prevalence of complete hydatidiform mole was high at 6.1%. Associated risk factors included advanced maternal age (35 years and above), history of previous abortions, and gestational age beyond the first trimester at the time of evacuations. Recommendations: We recommend putting in place capacity to do routine histopathological examination of all products of conception especially those at high risk for a molar gestation either by clinical suspicion or by risk factors including advanced maternal age, advanced gestational age, and history of previous abortion because of high prevalence of complete moleen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherObstetrics and Gynecology Internationalen_US
dc.subjectHydatidiform molesen_US
dc.subjectGestational trophoblastic diseaseen_US
dc.subjectUterine Evacuationen_US
dc.titlePrevalence and Factors Associated with Hydatidiform Mole among Patients Undergoing Uterine Evacuation at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospitalen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record