Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOdongo, Charles O.
dc.contributor.authorBisaso, Kuteesa R.
dc.contributor.authorNtale, Muhammad
dc.contributor.authorOdia, Gordon
dc.contributor.authorOjara, Francis W.
dc.contributor.authorByamugisha, Josaphat
dc.contributor.authorMukonzo, Jackson K.
dc.contributor.authorObua, Celestino
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-17T13:48:11Z
dc.date.available2022-08-17T13:48:11Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationOdongo, C. O., Bisaso, K. R., Ntale, M., Odia, G., Ojara, F. W., Byamugisha, J., ... & Obua, C. (2015). Trimester-specific population pharmacokinetics and other correlates of variability in sulphadoxine–pyrimethamine disposition among Ugandan pregnant women. Drugs in R&D, 15(4), 351-362.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/2389
dc.description.abstractBackground: Sulphadoxine–pyrimethamine (SP) is widely used as an intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy (IPTp). However, pharmacokinetic studies in pregnancy show variable and often contradictory findings. We describe population and trimester-specific differences in SP pharmacokinetics among Ugandan women. Methods: SP (three tablets) were administered to 34 non-pregnant and 87 pregnant women in the second trimester. Seventy-eight pregnant women were redosed in the third trimester. Blood was collected over time points ranging from 0.5 h to 42 days postdose. Data on the variables age, body weight, height, parity, gestational age, and serum creatinine, alanine transaminase and albumin levels were collected at baseline. Plasma drug assays were performed using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was done using NONMEM software. Results: A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and a lag time best described both the sulphadoxine and pyrimethamine data. Between trimesters, statistically significant differences in central volumes of distribution (V2) were observed for both drugs, while difference in the distribution half-life and the terminal elimination half-life were observed for pyrimethamine and sulphadoxine, respectively. Significant covariate relationships were identified on clearance (pregnancy status and serum albumin level) and V2 (gestational age) for sulphadoxine. For pyrimethamine, clearance (pregnancy status and age) and V2 (gestational age and body weight) were significant. Considering a 25 % threshold for clinical relevance, only differences in clearance of both drugs between pregnant and non-pregnant women were significant. Conclusion: While clinically relevant differences in SP disposition between trimesters were not seen, increased clearance with pregnancy and the increasing volume of distribution in the central compartment with gestational age lend support to the revised World Health Organization guidelines advocating more frequent dosing of SP for IPTpen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGrant Number 5R24TW008886 supported by the following offices of the USA: Office of the US Global Aids Coordinator (OGAC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherDrugs in R&Den_US
dc.subjectPopulationen_US
dc.subjectPregnant Womenen_US
dc.subjectSulphadoxine–pyrimethamineen_US
dc.subjectpreventive treatmenten_US
dc.titleTrimester-Specific Population Pharmacokinetics and Other Correlates of Variability in Sulphadoxine–Pyrimethamine Disposition Among Ugandan Pregnant Womenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record