Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSekajugo, John
dc.contributor.authorKagoro-Rugunda, Grace
dc.contributor.authorMutyebere, Rodgers
dc.contributor.authorKabaseke, Clovis
dc.contributor.authorMubiru, David
dc.contributor.authorKanyiginya, Violet
dc.contributor.authorVrankene, Liesbet
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Liesbet
dc.contributor.authorDewitte, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorKervyn, Matthieu
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-30T09:55:12Z
dc.date.available2024-01-30T09:55:12Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationSekajugo, J., Kagoro-Rugunda, G., Mutyebere, R., Kabaseke, C., Mubiru, D., Kanyiginya, V., ... & Kervyn, M. (2024). Exposure and physical vulnerability to geo-hydrological hazards in rural environments: A field-based assessment in East Africa. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 104282.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/3358
dc.description.abstractGeo-hydrological hazards (landslides and floods) are often associated with large impact on physical infrastructures, affecting strongly the exposed population. Understanding in detail the nature of exposure and what determines the extent of impact is a pre-requisite for building resilient structures and reducing vulnerability. However, such information is rarely available, especially in rural communities where people are often the most vulnerable. In this study we document the impact of landslide and flood hazards in 17 sub-counties in the mid- and south-western parts of Uganda between May2019 and March 2021 through extensive fieldwork involving local stake-holders. We quantify the economic value of the physical damage of landslide and flood hazards on exposed buildings, roads and bridges. We then determine statistically the factors that influence the physical vulnerability of the elements at risk based on damage ratios, i.e. monetary value of each individual building damage. Divided by its initial construction value. A total of 91 and 212 buildings were documented from the landslide and flood-hazard affected zones, respectively. Out of the 91l and slide affected buildings,71% were completely destroyed and 4% severely damaged, while 19% had minor-to-no damage at all. For floods, 37% of the buildings were completely destroyed and 6% were severely damaged, while 53% had minor-to-no damage. The impact of landslides and floods is unevenly distributed across the study sub-counties and the extent of loss they cause also vary with exposed elements. Based on parameters that could be documented through our field-based approach, we conclude that while the physical vulnerability of buildings to landslides is equally associated with both landslide size and building structural characteristics, the physical vulnerability due to floods is largely linked to the flood depth. This quantitative study therefore shows the need for plans, policies and strategies geared towards improving the building resistance to landslides and controlling settlements in flood prone places.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFlemish Inter University Council (VLIR-UOS) through the TEAM project (UG2019TEA492A105en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reductionen_US
dc.subjectNatural hazard risken_US
dc.subjectVulnerability curveen_US
dc.subjectFloodsen_US
dc.subjectLandslidesen_US
dc.subjectField-based damage estimationen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.titleExposure and physical vulnerability to geo-hydrological hazards in rural environments: A field-based assessmet in East Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record