Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKobusiingye, Florah
dc.contributor.authorSsembatya, Richard
dc.contributor.authorKaggwa, Fred
dc.contributor.authorEjiri, Annabella Habinka
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-16T09:40:51Z
dc.date.available2024-10-16T09:40:51Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationKobusiingye, F., Ssembatya, R., Kaggwa, F., & Ejiri, A. H. (2024). Evaluating Agricultural Extension Frameworks in Resource-Constrained Regions: Strengths and Weaknesses. European Journal of Science, Innovation and Technology, 4(4), 306-310.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/3891
dc.description.abstractAgricultural extension frameworks are crucial in enhancing farming practices and improving livelihoods in resource-constrained regions. This study evaluates five prominent agricultural extension frameworks: Farmer Field School (FFS), Problem-Based Learning (PBL), Training of Trainers (ToT), Agricultural Knowledge and Information System (AKIS), and Farmer-to Farmer Extension (F2FE) to identify their strengths and weaknesses. The analysis reveals that while each framework has merits such as participatory learning and scalability, they also face challenges including resource intensity and limited reach. This paper proposes a hybrid model integrating the strengths of these frameworks while addressing their limitations, aiming to provide a more effective agricultural extension system for regions like Uganda.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEuropean Journal of Science, Innovation and Technologyen_US
dc.subjectAgricultural extension frameworksen_US
dc.subjectEnhancing farming practicesen_US
dc.subjectImproving livelihoodsen_US
dc.subjectResource-constrained regionsen_US
dc.titleEvaluating Agricultural Extension Frameworks in Resource-Constrained Regions: Strengths and Weaknessesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record