Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKhwaja, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorBuchan, Claire
dc.contributor.authorWearn, Oliver R.
dc.contributor.authorBahaa-el-din, Laila
dc.contributor.authorBantlin, Drew
dc.contributor.authorBernard, Henry
dc.contributor.authorBitariho, Robert
dc.contributor.authorBohmi, Torsten
dc.contributor.authorBorah, Jimmy
dc.contributor.authorBrodie, Jedediah
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-07T07:15:20Z
dc.date.available2021-05-07T07:15:20Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationKhwaja, H., Buchan, C., Wearn, O. R., Bantlin, D., Bernard, H., Bitariho, R., ... & Challender, D. W. (2019). Pangolins in global camera trap data: Implications for ecological monitoring. Global Ecology and Conservation, 20, e00769.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/774
dc.descriptionStatistics findingsen_US
dc.description.abstractDespite being heavily exploited, pangolins (Pholidota: Manidae) have been subject to limited research, resulting in a lack of reliable population estimates and standardized survey methods for the eight extant species. Camera trapping represents a unique opportunity for broad-scale collaborative species monitoring due to its largely non-discriminatory nature, which creates considerable volumes of data on a relatively wide range of species. This has the potential to shed light on the ecology of rare, cryptic and understudied taxa, with implications for conservation decision-making. We undertook a global analysis of available pangolin data from camera trapping studies across their range in Africa and Asia. Our aims were (1) to assess the utility of existing camera trapping efforts as a method for monitoring pangolin populations, and (2) to gain insights into the distribution and ecology of pangolins. We analysed data collated from 103 camera trap surveys undertaken across 22 countries that fell within the range of seven of the eight pangolin species, which yielded more than half a million trap nights and 888 pangolin encounters. We ran occupancy analyses on three species (Sunda pangolin Manis javanica, white-bellied pangolin Phataginus tricuspisand giant pangolin Smutsia gigantea). Detection probabilities varied with forest cover and levels of human influence for P. tricuspis, but H. Khwaja et al. / Global Ecology and Conservation 20 (2019) e007692 were low (<0.05) for all species. Occupancy was associated with distance from rivers fo rM.javanicaand S. gigantea, elevation for P. Tricuspisand S. gigantea, forest cover for P. Tricuspis and protected area status for M. javanicaand P. tricuspis. We conclude that camera traps are suitable for the detection of pangolins and large-scale assessment of their distributions. However, the trapping effort required to monitor populations at any given study site using existing methods appears prohibitively high. This may change in the future should anticipated technological and methodological advances in camera trapping facilitate greater sampling efforts and/or higher probabilities of detection. In particular, targeted camera placement for pangolins is likely to make pangolin monitoring more feasible with moderate sampling efforts.©2019en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGlobal Ecology and Conservationen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherjournal homepage:http://www.elsevier.com/locate/geccoen_US
dc.subjectPangolinsen_US
dc.subjectecological monitoringen_US
dc.subjectglobal camera trapen_US
dc.subjectConservationen_US
dc.titlePangolins in global camera trap data: Implications for ecological monitoringen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record