Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOcan, Moses
dc.contributor.authorObuku, A. Ekwaro
dc.contributor.authorBwanga, Freddie
dc.contributor.authorAkena, Dickens
dc.contributor.authorSennono, Richard
dc.contributor.authorOgwal-Okeng, Jasper
dc.contributor.authorObua, Celestino
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-12T13:41:38Z
dc.date.available2019-12-12T13:41:38Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationOcan, M., Obuku, E. A., Bwanga, F., Akena, D., Richard, S., Ogwal-Okeng, J., & Obua, C. (2015). Household antimicrobial self-medication: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the burden, risk factors and outcomes in developing countries. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2109-3en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/353
dc.description.abstractBackground: Antimicrobial self-medication is common in most low and middle income countries (LMICs). However there has been no systematic review on non-prescription antimicrobial use in these settings. This review thus intended to establish the burden, risk factors and effects of antimicrobial self-medication in Low and Middle Income Countries. Methods: In 2012, we registered a systematic review protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42012002508). We searched PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Embase databases using the following terms; “self-medication”, “non-prescription”, ‘self-treatment’, “antimicrobial”, “antimalarial”, “antibiotic”, “antibacterial” “2002-2012” and combining them using Boolean operators. We performed independent and duplicate screening and abstraction of study administrative data, prevalence, determinants, type of antimicrobial agent, source, disease conditions, inappropriate use, drug adverse events and clinical outcomes of antibiotic self-medication where possible. We performed a Random Effects Meta-analysis. Results: A total of thirty four (34) studies involving 31,340 participants were included in the review. The overall prevalence of antimicrobial self-medication was 38.8 % (95 % CI: 29.5-48.1). Most studies assessed non-prescription use of antibacterial (17/34: 50 %) and antimalarial (5/34: 14.7 %) agents. The common disease symptoms managed were, respiratory (50 %), fever (47 %) and gastrointestinal (45 %). The major sources of antimicrobials included, pharmacies (65.5 %), leftover drugs (50 %) and drug shops (37.5 %). Twelve (12) studies reported inappropriate drug use; not completing dose (6/12) and sharing of medicines (4/12). The main determinants of antimicrobial self-medication include, level of education, age, gender, past successful use, severity of illness and income. Reported negative outcomes of antimicrobial self-medication included, allergies (2/34: 5.9 %), lack of cure (4/34: 11.8 %) and causing death (2/34: 5.9 %). The commonly reported positive outcome was recovery from illness (4/34: 11.8 %). Conclusion: The prevalence of antimicrobial self-medication is high and varies in different communities as well as by social determinants of health and is frequently associated with inappropriate drug use.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMC Public Healthen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol.15;No.1
dc.subjectAntimicrobialen_US
dc.subjectSelf-medicationen_US
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectDeveloping countriesen_US
dc.titleHousehold antimicrobial self-medication: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the burden, risk factors and outcomes in developing countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record