Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGumbi, Bhekumuzi P.
dc.contributor.authorMoodley, Brenda
dc.contributor.authorBirungi, Grace
dc.contributor.authorNdungu, Patrick G.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-09T12:18:56Z
dc.date.available2024-05-09T12:18:56Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationGumbi, B. P., Moodley, B., Birungi, G., & Ndungu, P. G. (2022). Risk assessment of personal care products, pharmaceuticals, and stimulants in Mgeni and Msunduzi Rivers, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Frontiers in Water, 4, 867201.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/3639
dc.description.abstractIn this work, environmental occurrence and risk assessment of pharmaceuticals, personal care products (PPCPs), and stimulants are presented. A quantitative technique isdescribedforultrasonic-assistedsolid-phaseextraction(SPE)followedbyGC-MSafter derivatization of PPCPs; propylparaben, triclosan, carbamazepine, chloramphenicol, and stimulant caffeine. Ultrasonic-assisted extraction together with centrifugation were used to extract sediment samples collected from the Mgeni and Msunduzi rivers. An SPE procedure was used for cleanup and to concentrate selected compounds from diluted aqueous extracts. The final extracts were derivatized and analyzed with GC-MS in selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode. The recoveries of the analytes ranged from 66 to 108%. The method detection limits were (0.08–1.82 ng g−1 for solid and 0.08–10 µg L−1 for liquid) and quantification limits (0.42–5.51 ng g−1 for solid and 0.25–25 µg L−1 for liquid). The optimized method was applied in the evaluation of two rivers over 3 months in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. All targeted compounds were present in the environment at concentration levels between not detected to 174 ng g−1 and not detected to 30 µg L−1 for solids and aqueous environmental samples, respectively. A comparison of predicted no environmental effect concentration (PNECs) with measured environmental concentration (MECs) showed that these PPCPs present a high ecological risk to the receiving environment (agricultural lands and households). Our work is close to reality because we used MECs as opposed to using predicted environmental concentration (PECs) values, which are normally calculated from consumption, production of compound per year, and various estimated factors.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWater Research Commission of South Africa (Project No. K5/2215//3).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers in Wateren_US
dc.subjectUltrasonicen_US
dc.subjectDerivatizationen_US
dc.subjectGC-MSen_US
dc.subjectPersonal care productsen_US
dc.subjectPharmaceuticalen_US
dc.titleRisk Assessment of Personal Care Products, Pharmaceuticals, and Stimulants in Mgeni and Msunduzi Rivers, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record