Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKyomuhangi, Teddy
dc.contributor.authorManalili, Kimberly
dc.contributor.authorKabakyenga, Jerome
dc.contributor.authorTuryakira, Eleanor
dc.contributor.authorMatovelo, Dismas
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Sobia
dc.contributor.authorKyokushaba, Clare
dc.contributor.authorMacIntosh, Heather
dc.contributor.authorBrenner, Jennifer L.
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-02T10:09:47Z
dc.date.available2024-10-02T10:09:47Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationKyomuhangi, T., Manalili, K., Kabakyenga, J., Turyakira, E., Matovelo, D., Khan, S., ... & Brenner, J. L. (2022). Health system strengthening using a Maximizing Engagement for Readiness and Impact (MERI) Approach: A community case study. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 952213.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/3845
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Health system strengthening initiatives in low and middle income countries are commonly hampered by limited implementation readiness. The Maximizing Engagement for Readiness and Impact (MERI) Approach uses a system “readiness” theory of change to address implementation obstacles. MERI is documented based on field experiences, incorporating best practices, and lessons learned from two decades of maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) programming in East Africa. Context: The MERI Approach is informed by four sequential and progressively larger MNCH interventions in Uganda and Tanzania. Intervention evaluations incorporating qualitative and quantitative data sources assessed health and process outcomes. Implementer, technical leader, stakeholder, and policymaker reflections on sequential experiences have enabled MERI Approach adaptation and documentation, using an implementation lens and an implementation science readiness theory of change. Key programmatic elements: The MERI Approach comprises three core components. MERI Change Strategies (meetings, equipping, training, mentoring) describe key activity types that build general and intervention specific capacity to maximize and sustain intervention effectiveness. The SOPETAR Process Model (Scan, Orient, Plan, Equip, Train, Act, Reflect) is a series of purposeful steps that, in sequence, drive each implementation level (district, health facility, community). A MERI Motivational Framework identifies foundational factors (self-reliance, collective-action, embeddedness, comprehensiveness, transparency) that motivate participants and enhance intervention adoption. Components aim to enhance implementer and system readiness while engaging broad stakeholders in capacity building activities toward health outcome goals. Activities align with government policy and programming and are embedded within existing district, health facility, and community structures. Discussion: This case study demonstrates feasibility of the MERI Approach to support district wide MNCH programming in two low-income countries, supportive of health outcome and health system improvements. The MERI Approach has potential to engage districts, health facilities, and communities toward sustainable health outcomes, addressing intervention implementation gaps for current and emerging health needs within and beyond East Africa.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGovernment of Canada through Global Affairs Canadaen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers in Public Healthen_US
dc.subjectImplementationen_US
dc.subjectHealth system strengthening (HSS)en_US
dc.subjectReadinessen_US
dc.subjectGlobal healthen_US
dc.subjectEngagementen_US
dc.subjectMaternal healthen_US
dc.subjectNewborn healthen_US
dc.titleHealth system strengthening using a Maximizing Engagement for Readiness and Impact (MERI) Approach-A community case studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record