Cost-effectiveness of malaria microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests versus presumptive diagnosis: implications for malaria control in Uganda

dc.contributor.authorBatwala, Vicent
dc.contributor.authorMagnussen, Pascal
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Kristian S
dc.contributor.authorNuwaha, Fred
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-28T10:23:29Z
dc.date.available2021-04-28T10:23:29Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.descriptionCost-effectiveness of malaria microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests versus presumptive diagnosis.en_US
dc.description.abstractCurrent Uganda National Malaria treatment guidelines recommend parasitological confirmation either by microscopy or rapid diagnostic test (RDT) before treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (AL). However, the cost-effectiveness of these strategies has not been assessed at rural operational primary care centers.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBatwala, V., Magnussen, P., Hansen, K. S., & Nuwaha, F. (2011). Cost-effectiveness of malaria microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests versus presumptive diagnosis: implications for malaria control in Uganda. Malaria journal, 10(1), 1-9.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/handle/123456789/668
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden_US
dc.subjectMalaria microscopy, rapid diagnostic, tests versus, diagnosis, malaria controlen_US
dc.titleCost-effectiveness of malaria microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests versus presumptive diagnosis: implications for malaria control in Ugandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Vicent.pdf
Size:
455.57 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Cost-effectiveness of malaria microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests versus presumptive diagnosis.

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: