Integrated feedstock chemistry and prepared-microstructure controls on inert decomposition of briquetted biomass residues: Groundnut shell versus pine wood chippings

dc.contributor.authorGeorge,Onep Samuel
dc.contributor.authorBarah,Obinna Onyebuchi
dc.contributor.authorNnamchi,Stephen Ndubuisi
dc.contributor.authorDennison,Milon Selvam
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-25T08:53:05Z
dc.date.issued2026-07-20
dc.description.abstractFeedstock variability remains a major constraint in small-scale biomass conversion systems, yet preliminary feedstock screening often relies on bulk fuel properties that provide limited insight into decomposition behavior. This study compares binder-less briquetted groundnut shell (GNS) and pine wood chippings (PWC) to determine how bulk composition, prepared-surface morphology, surface elemental signals, and broad functional-group signatures coincide with inert thermal decomposition behavior. Both feedstocks were conditioned to low moisture content and characterized using proximate analysis, higher heating value determination, thermogravimetric analysis under nitrogen, SEM-EDX, and ATR-FTIR. PWC exhibited higher volatile matter than GNS (71.88 vs. 67.40 wt% db.) and lower ash content (1.72 vs. 3.30 wt% db.), whereas GNS showed higher fixed carbon (19.94 vs. 17.18 wt% db.) and higher HHV (18.87 vs. 17.04 MJ kg⁻¹). Under inert heating, PWC decomposed earlier, with lower onset and peak decomposition temperatures, whereas GNS retained substantially more terminal residue at 1000 ◦C. SEM revealed a more heterogeneous, fracture-dominated prepared surface for GNS and a more fibrous, channel-like prepared surface for PWC. EDX and ATR-FTIR further supported differences in detected surface elemental balance and broad functional-group profiles. Overall, the results demonstrate statistically consistent differences between the two briquetted residues and establish a characterization-based basis for cautious preliminary screening. In the absence of ultimate analysis, direct lignocellulosic fractionation, mineralogical analysis, and reactor-scale gasification testing, the findings define a comparative laboratory basis for interpreting inert decomposition behavior, rather than a predictive framework for gasifier performance.
dc.identifier.citationGeorge, O. S., Barah, O. O., Nnamchi, S. N., & Dennison, M. S. (2026). Integrated feedstock chemistry and prepared-microstructure controls on inert decomposition of briquetted biomass residues: Groundnut shell versus pine wood chippings. Next Materials, 13, 102842.
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.must.ac.ug/handle/123456789/4462
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNext Materials
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.subjectBiomass characterization
dc.subjectComparative screening
dc.subjectBriquetted biomass
dc.subjectGroundnut shell
dc.subjectPine wood chippings
dc.subjectInert heating
dc.subjectResidue valorization
dc.titleIntegrated feedstock chemistry and prepared-microstructure controls on inert decomposition of briquetted biomass residues: Groundnut shell versus pine wood chippings
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Integrated feedstock chemistry and prepared-microstructure controls on inert decomposition of briquetted biomass residues Groundnut shell versus pine wood chippings.pdf
Size:
5.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: