Integrated feedstock chemistry and prepared-microstructure controls on inert decomposition of briquetted biomass residues: Groundnut shell versus pine wood chippings
| dc.contributor.author | George,Onep Samuel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Barah,Obinna Onyebuchi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nnamchi,Stephen Ndubuisi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dennison,Milon Selvam | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-25T08:53:05Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-07-20 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Feedstock variability remains a major constraint in small-scale biomass conversion systems, yet preliminary feedstock screening often relies on bulk fuel properties that provide limited insight into decomposition behavior. This study compares binder-less briquetted groundnut shell (GNS) and pine wood chippings (PWC) to determine how bulk composition, prepared-surface morphology, surface elemental signals, and broad functional-group signatures coincide with inert thermal decomposition behavior. Both feedstocks were conditioned to low moisture content and characterized using proximate analysis, higher heating value determination, thermogravimetric analysis under nitrogen, SEM-EDX, and ATR-FTIR. PWC exhibited higher volatile matter than GNS (71.88 vs. 67.40 wt% db.) and lower ash content (1.72 vs. 3.30 wt% db.), whereas GNS showed higher fixed carbon (19.94 vs. 17.18 wt% db.) and higher HHV (18.87 vs. 17.04 MJ kg⁻¹). Under inert heating, PWC decomposed earlier, with lower onset and peak decomposition temperatures, whereas GNS retained substantially more terminal residue at 1000 ◦C. SEM revealed a more heterogeneous, fracture-dominated prepared surface for GNS and a more fibrous, channel-like prepared surface for PWC. EDX and ATR-FTIR further supported differences in detected surface elemental balance and broad functional-group profiles. Overall, the results demonstrate statistically consistent differences between the two briquetted residues and establish a characterization-based basis for cautious preliminary screening. In the absence of ultimate analysis, direct lignocellulosic fractionation, mineralogical analysis, and reactor-scale gasification testing, the findings define a comparative laboratory basis for interpreting inert decomposition behavior, rather than a predictive framework for gasifier performance. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | George, O. S., Barah, O. O., Nnamchi, S. N., & Dennison, M. S. (2026). Integrated feedstock chemistry and prepared-microstructure controls on inert decomposition of briquetted biomass residues: Groundnut shell versus pine wood chippings. Next Materials, 13, 102842. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.must.ac.ug/handle/123456789/4462 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Next Materials | |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | |
| dc.subject | Biomass characterization | |
| dc.subject | Comparative screening | |
| dc.subject | Briquetted biomass | |
| dc.subject | Groundnut shell | |
| dc.subject | Pine wood chippings | |
| dc.subject | Inert heating | |
| dc.subject | Residue valorization | |
| dc.title | Integrated feedstock chemistry and prepared-microstructure controls on inert decomposition of briquetted biomass residues: Groundnut shell versus pine wood chippings | |
| dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Integrated feedstock chemistry and prepared-microstructure controls on inert decomposition of briquetted biomass residues Groundnut shell versus pine wood chippings.pdf
- Size:
- 5.55 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: