Effectiveness of the Modified WHO Labour Care Guide to Detect Prolonged and Obstructed Labour Among Women Admitted at Eight Publicly Funded, Midwife-Led Community Health Facilities in Rural Mbarara District, Southwestern Uganda: An Ambispective Cohort Study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Mugyenyi, Godfrey Rwambuka
Tumuhimbise, Wilson
Atukunda, Esther C.
Tibaijuka, Leevan
Ngonzi, Joseph
Kayondo, Musa
Kanyesigye, Micheal
Musimenta, Angella
Yarine, Leodnell Fajardo Tornes
Byamugisha, Josaphat K

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

International Journal of Women's Health

Abstract

Background: Obstructed labour, a sequel of prolonged labour, remains a significant contributor to maternal and perinatal deaths in low resource settings. Objective: We evaluated the modified WHO labour care guide (LCG) in detecting prolonged/obstructed labour compared to the traditional partograph at publicly funded maternity centers in Southwestern Uganda. Methods: LCG was deployed to monitor labour by trained health care providers in 2023. We reviewed all patient labour monitoring records for the first quarter of 2024 (LCG-intervention) and 2023 (partograph-before LCG introduction) from eight randomized maternity centers. Our primary outcome was the proportion of women diagnosed with prolonged and or obstructed labour. Secondary outcomes included: mode of delivery, labour augmentation, stillbirths, maternal deaths, Apgar score, uterine rupture, postpartum haemorrhage and tool completion. Data was collected in REDcap and analyzed using STATA v17; statistical significance was p < 0.05. Results: A total of 991 (49.3%) and 1020 (50.7%) women were monitored using the LCG and partograph, respectively. The mean maternal and gestation ages were similar between the two groups, reported at 25.9 (SD=5.6) years, and 39.4 (SD=1.8) weeks, respectively. Overall, 120 (12.4%) cases of prolonged/obstructed labour were diagnosed (100 for LCG versus 20 for partograph); LCG had six times higher odds of diagnosing prolonged/obstructed labour compared to the partograph (aOR = 5.94;CI 95%3.63–9.73, P < 0.001). Detection of obstructed labour alone using LCG increased 12-fold compared to the partograph (aOR = 11.74;CI 95%3.55–- 38.74, P < 0.001). We observed increased Caesarean section rates (aOR=6.12;CI 95%4.32–8.67, P < 0.001), augmentation of labour (aOR = 3.11;CI 95%1.81–5.35, P < 0.001), Apgar Score at 5 minutes (aOR = 2.29;CI 95%1.11–5.77, P = 0.025) and tool completion rate (aOR = 2.11;CI 95%1.08–5.44, P < 0.001). We observed no differences in stillbirths, maternal deaths, postpartum haemorrhage and uterine rupture. Conclusion: Our data shows that LCG diagnosed more cases of prolonged and obstructed labour compared to the partograph among women delivering at rural publicly funded midwife-led facilities in Southwestern Uganda. More controlled and powered studies should evaluate the two tools in different facilities and sub-populations.

Description

Citation

Mugyenyi, G. R., Tumuhimbise, W., Atukunda, E. C., Tibaijuka, L., Ngonzi, J., Kayondo, M., ... & Byamugisha, J. K. (2025). Effectiveness of the Modified WHO Labour Care Guide to Detect Prolonged and Obstructed Labour Among Women Admitted at Eight Publicly Funded, Midwife-Led Community Health Facilities in Rural Mbarara District, Southwestern Uganda: An Ambispective Cohort Study. International Journal of Women's Health, 271-285.

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States