‘We would look at the chickens as a source of security’: microenterprise and health in rural Uganda

dc.contributor.authorJustus Kananura
dc.contributor.authorBridget FO Burns
dc.contributor.authorCharles Baguma
dc.contributor.authorRumbidzai C Mushavi
dc.contributor.authorEmily N Satinsky
dc.contributor.authorAllen Kiconco
dc.contributor.authorElizabeth B Namara
dc.contributor.authorClare Kamagara
dc.contributor.authorElijah Musinguzi
dc.contributor.authorOwen Alleluya
dc.contributor.authorDavid R Bangsberg
dc.contributor.authorAlexander C Tsai
dc.contributor.authorBernard Kakuhikire
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-11T13:34:45Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractBackground: Development interventions may promote sustainable livelihoods among participants via improved income generation, health, education, and quality of life. Within the development literature, microfinance institutions (MFIs) provide individuals with funds and/or startup capital to develop small businesses. However, the evidence on whether MFIs are successful in ensuring sustainable livelihoods is mixed. In this study, we assessed participants’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to a poultry microenterprise intervention, and the impact of the intervention on enabling sustainable livelihoods for the participants, their families, and their community. Methods: During exit interviews, 30 women who had participated in a poultry microenterprise demonstration project in rural Uganda nine months prior described their experiences in the intervention, including perceived benefits and challenges, and discussed specific factors that impacted their continuity in the project. We analysed the interviews using a content analysis approach. Results: The participants noted instrumental and interpersonal benefits of the intervention: greater financial security, increased trust from community members, social support, empowerment, and skills-building. Despite these facilitators, challenges precluded some of them from establishing sustainable livelihoods. Pervasive poverty, poultry disease outbreaks, poor spousal/familial support, and challenges in effectively communicating the goal of the intervention stood as barriers to the establishment of sustained poultry businesses. While most participants (n/N=20/30) reached the final phase of the intervention, only six continued rearing chickens beyond the project. Conclusions: Barriers and facilitators described by the participants and identified in our analysis bear implications for the design, implementation, and evaluation of microenterprise interventions aimed at providing participants with sustainable livelihoods. Our findings highlight the importance of qualitative research in identifying concerns and informing intervention adaptations.
dc.description.sponsorshipFriends of a Healthy Uganda and US National Institutes of Health (NIH) K23MH096620-01A1.
dc.identifier.citationKananura, J., Burns, B. F., Baguma, C., Mushavi, R. C., Satinsky, E. N., Kiconco, A., ... & Kakuhikire, B. (2025). ‘We would look at the chickens as a source of security’: microenterprise and health in rural Uganda. Journal of Global Health, 15, 04074.
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.must.ac.ug/handle/123456789/4145
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJournal of Global Health
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.subjectDevelopment interventions
dc.subjectChickens
dc.subjectMicroenterprise and health
dc.subjectUganda
dc.title‘We would look at the chickens as a source of security’: microenterprise and health in rural Uganda
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
‘We would look at the chickens as a source of security’- microenterprise and health in rural Uganda.pdf
Size:
638.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: