Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKanyesigye, Hamson
dc.contributor.authorNgonzi, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorMulogo, Edgar
dc.contributor.authorFajardo, Yarine
dc.contributor.authorMacDonald, Noni E.
dc.contributor.authorKabakyenga, Jerome
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-02T12:18:01Z
dc.date.available2023-03-02T12:18:01Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-27
dc.identifier.citationKanyesigye, H., Ngonzi, J., Mulogo, E., Fajardo, Y., MacDonald, N. E., & Kabakyenga, J. (2023). Acceptability of Phone-Based Communication Intervention by Healthcare Workers as an Adjunct to Routine Referral Form: A Qualitative Study in South Western Uganda. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, 13(2), 23-40.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/2802
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: A functional maternal referral system should encompass a feasible communication system between health facilities. In Uganda, the current paper-based patient referral form is associated with inadequate patient- information and low feedback rates. A recent quasi-experimental study demonstrated that a phone-based communication intervention is feasible for iterative communication between health facilities, and there were improved maternal-fetal outcomes and high rates of feedback. However, the acceptability of the intervention was not assessed. Objective: The study assessed the acceptability of a phone-based communication intervention by the health care workers (HCWs) for iterative communication between the referring and receiving health facilities. Methods: This was a qualitative study conducted in South Western Uganda, in April 2021. The study employed a theoretical framework of acceptability of medical interventions. We conducted in-depth interviews with HCWs and used deductive-inductive analysis. Results: We enrolled a total of 23 HCWs, of whom 69.6% (n = 16) were females while 30.4% (n = 7) were males. Majority (65.2%, n = 15), were midwives and the rest were: doctors (30.4%, n = 7) and a nurse (4.3%). The HCWs were positive towards the intervention: they believed that the intervention reduced delays, promoted professional escort, encouraged sharing of supplies, enabled exchange of relatively more patient details, feedback and improved case management. They believed it was culturally acceptable and had enough skills and experience of operating phones. All participants recommended scale out of the intervention, but advised on the need for dedicated human-resource to coordinate phone calls, ensure availability of airtime and charged battery. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the phone-based communication intervention was highly accepted by the healthcare workers, and that hospitals can successfully give feedback to lower health centres through iterative phone calls. This provides a possible solution to the long-standing challenge of poor feedback rates and a vicious cycle of poor maternal-fetal outcomes in resource limited settings.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOpen Journal of Preventive Medicineen_US
dc.subjectAcceptabilityen_US
dc.subjectPhone-Based Communication Interventionen_US
dc.subjectReferral Formen_US
dc.subjectHealthcare Workersen_US
dc.titleAcceptability of Phone-Based Communication Intervention by Healthcare Workers as an Adjunct to Routine Referral Form: A Qualitative Study in South Western Ugandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record