Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAsiimwe, John Baptist
dc.contributor.authorNamulema, Angella
dc.contributor.authorSserwanja, Quraish
dc.contributor.authorKawuki, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorAmperiize, Mathius
dc.contributor.authorAmwiine, Earnest
dc.contributor.authorNuwabaine, Lilian
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-31T08:56:06Z
dc.date.available2024-10-31T08:56:06Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationAsiimwe, J. B., Namulema, A., Sserwanja, Q., Kawuki, J., Amperiize, M., Amwiine, E., & Nuwabaine, L. (2024). Determinants of quality antenatal care use in Kenya: Insights from the 2022 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey. PLOS Global Public Health, 4(9), e0003460.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/3921
dc.description.abstractProvision of quality antenatal care (ANC) is important to reduce maternal and newborn fatalities worldwide. However, the use of quality ANC by women of reproductive age and associated factors remain unclear in many developing countries. Therefore, this study aimed to determine factors associated with receiving quality ANC in Kenya among women of reproductive age. We analyzed secondary data from the 2022 Kenya Demographic Health Sur vey, which included 11,863 women. Participants were selected using two-stage stratified sampling. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the data. Of the 11,863 participating women, 61.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 59.7% 62.6%) received quality ANC. Participants aged 20–34 years had a 1.82 (95%CI: 1.15 2.87) times higher likelihood of receiving quality ANC compared with those aged 15–19 years. Those who had attended four or more ANC visits were 1.42 (95%CI: 1.14–1.79) times more likely to receive quality ANC than those who attended three or fewer visits. Participants with media access were 1.47 (95%CI: 1.06–2.03) times more likely to receive quality ANC than those without media access. Compared with participants in the “poorest” quintile, the likelihood of receiving quality ANC was 1.93 (95%CI: 1.21–3.08) and 1.44 (95% CI: 1.01–2.06) times higher for participants in the “richest” and “richer” quintiles, respectively. Furthermore, compared with participants from the Coastal region, the odds of receiving quality ANC were 0.25 (95%CI: 0.15–0.31) to 0.64 (95%CI: 0.44–0.92) times lower for those from all other Kenyan regions. Participants whose partners made their healthcare decisions were 0.74 (95%CI: 0.58–0.95) times less likely to receive quality ANC than those who made decisions independently. We found that just over 60% of participating mothers had received quality ANC. Factors associated with receiving quality ANC were: age, region, maternal education, healthcare-seeking decision-making, access to media, time to the health facility, ANC visits, and ANC provider type (doctor, nurse/midwife/clinical officer). Maternal health improvement programs should prioritize promoting access to education for girls. Furthermore, interventions should focus on promoting shared decision-making and autonomy in healthcare-seeking behaviors among pregnant women and their partners, increasing access to care provided by skilled healthcare workers, and addressing regional disparities in healthcare delivery.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPLOS Global Public Healthen_US
dc.subjectProvision of quality antenatal care (ANC)en_US
dc.subjectQuality antenatal careen_US
dc.subjectHealth Surveyen_US
dc.subjectNewborn fatalitiesen_US
dc.titleDeterminants of quality antenatal care use in Kenya: Insights from the 2022 Kenya Demographic and Health Surveyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record