Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLubinga, Solomon J
dc.contributor.authorLevine, Gillian A
dc.contributor.authorJenny, Alisa M
dc.contributor.authorNgonzi, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorMukasa-Kivunike, Peter
dc.contributor.authorStergachis, Andy
dc.contributor.authorBabigumira, Joseph B
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-13T09:00:07Z
dc.date.available2022-01-13T09:00:07Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationLubinga, S. J., Levine, G. A., Jenny, A. M., Ngonzi, J., Mukasa-Kivunike, P., Stergachis, A., & Babigumira, J. B. (2013). Health-related quality of life and social support among women treated for abortion complications in western Uganda. Health and quality of life outcomes, 11(1), 1-8.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/1149
dc.description.abstractBackground: While the impact of abortion complications on clinical outcomes and healthcare costs has been reported, we found no reports of their impact on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), nor the role of social support in moderating such outcomes. In this study, we performed an assessment of the relationship between abortion complications, HRQoL and social support among women in Uganda. Methods: We interviewed women who were discharged after treatment for abortion complications and, as a comparison, women visiting a regional referral hospital for routine obstetric care. We administered the EuroQol instrument and the Social Support Questionnaire Short-Form, and collected demographic and socioeconomic data. We performed descriptive analyses using t-tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and chi-square tests, and multivariable linear regressions with interaction effects to examine the associations between abortion complications, EQ-5D utility scores and social support. Results: Our study included 139 women (70 with abortion complications, and 69 receiving routine obstetric care). In four out of the 5 dimensions of the EQ-5D, a larger proportion of women with abortion complications reported “some or severe” problems than women receiving routine obstetric care (self-care: 42% v 24%, p=0.033; usual activities: 49% v 16%, p<0.001; pain/discomfort: 68% v 25%, p<0.001; and anxiety/depression: 60% v 22%, p<0.001). After adjusting for age, social support, wealth tertile, employment status, marital status, and HIV status, women with abortion complications had a 0.12 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.18, p < 0.001) lower mean EQ-5D utility score than those receiving routine obstetric care. An analysis of the modifying effect of social support showed that a one-unit higher average number of people providing social support was associated with larger mean difference in EQ-5D utility score when comparing the two groups, while a one unit higher average satisfaction score with social support was associated with smaller mean differences in EQ-5D utility score. Conclusions: Our study suggests that abortion complications are associated with diminished HRQoL and the magnitude of the association depends on social support. However, the mediating role of social support in a setting of social and legal proscriptions to induced abortion is complex.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWilliam and Flora Hewlett Foundation.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherHealth and quality of life outcomesen_US
dc.subjectHealth-related quality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectEQ-5Den_US
dc.subjectAbortion complicationsen_US
dc.subjectSocial supporten_US
dc.titleHealth-related quality of life and social support among women treated for abortion complications in western Ugandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record