Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAsiimwe, John Baptist
dc.contributor.authorNagendrappa, Prakash B.
dc.contributor.authorAtukunda, Esther Cathyln
dc.contributor.authorKamatenesi, Mauda M.
dc.contributor.authorNambozi, Grace
dc.contributor.authorTolo, Casim U.
dc.contributor.authorSarki, Ahmed M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-14T12:44:33Z
dc.date.available2022-01-14T12:44:33Z
dc.date.issued2021-05
dc.identifier.citationAsiimwe, J. B., Nagendrappa, P. B., Atukunda, E. C., Kamatenesi, M. M., Nambozi, G., Tolo, C. U., ... & Sarki, A. M. (2021). Prevalence of the Use of Herbal Medicines among Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2021.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/1195
dc.description.abstractBackground. Although herbal medicines are used by patients with cancer in multiple oncology care settings, the magnitude of herbal medicine use in this context remains unclear. ) e purpose of this review was to establish the prevalence of herbal medicine use among patients with cancer, across various geographical settings and patient characteristics (age and gender categories). Methods. Electronic databases that were searched for data published, from January 2000 to January 2020, were Medline (PubMed), Google Scholar, Embase, and African Index Medicus. Eligible studies reporting prevalence estimates of herbal medicine use amongst cancer patients were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Studies were grouped by World Bank region and income groups. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to explore source of heterogeneity. Results. In total, 155 studies with data for 809,065 participants (53.95% female) met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the pooled prevalence of the use of herbal medicine among patients with cancer was 22% (95% confidence interval (CI): 18%–25%), with the highest prevalence estimates for Africa (40%, 95% CI: 23%–58%) and Asia (28%, 95% CI: 21%–35%).)E pooled prevalence estimate was higher across low- and middle-income countries (32%, 95% CI: 23%–42%) and lower across high-income countries (17%, 95% CI: 14%– 21%). Higher pooled prevalence estimates were found for adult patients with cancer (22%, 95% CI: 19%–26%) compared with children with cancer (18%, 95% CI: 11%–27%) and for female patients (27%, 95% CI: 19%–35%) compared with males (17%, 95% CI: 1%–47%). Conclusion. Herbal medicine is used by a large percentage of patients with cancer use. ) e findings of this review highlight the need for herbal medicine to be integrated in cancer care.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship)e Pharm Biotechnology and Traditional Medicine Center of Excellence (PHARMBIOTRAC) at Mbarara University of Science and Technology provided library and Internet services to support this study.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEvidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicineen_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectHerbal Medicinesen_US
dc.subjectPatients with Canceren_US
dc.subjectA Systematic Reviewen_US
dc.subjectMeta-Analysisen_US
dc.titlePrevalence of the Use of Herbal Medicines among Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record