Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRice, Brian Travis
dc.contributor.authorBisanzo, Mark
dc.contributor.authorMaling, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorJoseph, Ryan
dc.contributor.authorMowafi, Hani
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-02T10:14:18Z
dc.date.available2022-02-02T10:14:18Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-22
dc.identifier.citationRice, B. T., Bisanzo, M., Maling, S., Joseph, R., & Mowafi, H. (2018). Derivation and validation of a chief complaint shortlist for unscheduled acute and emergency care in Uganda. BMJ open, 8(6), e020188.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/1349
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Derive and validate a shortlist of chief complaints to describe unscheduled acute and emergency care in Uganda. Setting a single, private, not-for profit hospital in rural, southwestern Uganda. Participants From 2009 to 2015, 26 996 patient visits produced 42 566 total chief complaints for the derivation dataset, and from 2015 to 2017, 10 068 visits produced 20 165 total chief complaints for the validation dataset. Methods: a retrospective review of an emergency center quality assurance database was perf abstracted, cleaned and refined using language processing in Stata to produce a longlist of chief complaints, which was collapsed via a consensus process to produce a shortlist and turned into a web-based tool. This tool was used by two local Ugandan emergency care practitioners to categorise complaints from a second longlist produced from a separate validation dataset from the same study site. Their agreement on grouping was analysed using Cohen’s kappa to determine inter-rater reliability. The chief complaints describing 80% of patient visits from automated and consensus shortlists were combined to form a candidate chief complaint shortlist. Results: Automated data cleaning and refining recognised 95.8% of all complaints and produced a longlist of 555 chief complaints. The consensus process yielded a shortlist of 83 grouped chief complaints. The second validation dataset was reduced in Stata to a longlist of 451 complaints. Using the shortlist tool to categorise complaints produced 71.5% agreement, yielding a kappa of 0.70 showing substantial inter-rater reliability. Only one complaint did not fit into the shortlist and required a free-text amendment. The two shortlists were identical for the most common 14 complaints and combined to form a candidate list of 24 complaints that could characterise over 80% of all emergency center chief complaints. Conclusions: Shortlists of chief complaints can be generated to improve standardisation of data entry, facilitate research efforts and be employed for paper chart usage.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Openen_US
dc.subjectDerivation and validationen_US
dc.subjectChiefen_US
dc.subjectComplainten_US
dc.subjectShortlisten_US
dc.subjectUnscheduleden_US
dc.subjectAcute and emergency careen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.titleDerivation and validation of a chief complaint shortlist for unscheduled acute and emergency care in Ugandaen_US
dc.title.alternativeGlobal Emergency Care Investigators Group (Study Group)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record