Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaggwa, Bruhan
dc.contributor.authorKyeyune, Henry
dc.contributor.authorMunanura, Edson Ireeta
dc.contributor.authorAnywar, Godwin
dc.contributor.authorLutoti, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorAber, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.authorBagoloire, Lynn K.
dc.contributor.authorWeisheit, Anke
dc.contributor.authorTolo, Casim Umba
dc.contributor.authorKamba, Pakoyo Fadhiru
dc.contributor.authorOgwang, Patrick Engeu
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-25T09:44:50Z
dc.date.available2022-04-25T09:44:50Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationKaggwa, B., Kyeyune, H., Munanura, E. I., Anywar, G., Lutoti, S., Aber, J., ... & Ogwang, P. E. (2022). Safety and Efficacy of Medicinal Plants Used to Manufacture Herbal Products with Regulatory Approval in Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2022.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/1825
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Uganda National Drug Authority requires phytochemical screening, freedom from microbial contamination, and evidence of safety and efficacy of the constituent plants to register herbal products. Since Uganda has no pharmacopeia, safety, efficacy, and plant processing information are not readily available. We documented the plant materials used to manufacture products in Uganda and established evidence of their safety and efficacy and availability of monographs. Methods: NDA register of herbal products was reviewed, and a product list was extracted. herbal products were purchased from local pharmacies, and their labels were studied to identify plant ingredients and drug use. Literature was reviewed to document evidence of the safety and efficacy of the plant materials concerning manufacturer’s claims. Also, the WHO and available African Pharmacopeia were searched to establish the availability of the plant monographs. Results: Of the 84 NDA-registered local products, only 18 were obtained from the market; 82% were indicated for respiratory tract disorders.Thirty-three plant materials were listed with Eucalyptus globulus Labill, being the commonest. Several in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate efficacy, thus supporting the use of the selected plant species for empirical treatment as stated on the product label. While most plants were safe, some species such as Albizia coriaria Oliv. had dose-dependent toxicities that cannot be predicted in combinations.WHO, African Pharmacopoeia, and West African Herbal Pharmacopoeia had only 16 plant monographs of the 33 plants of interest. Nevertheless, Aloe vera (L.) Burm.f., Azadirachta indica A.Juss., Zingiber officinale Roscoe, and Allium sativum L. monographs were published by all three pharmacopoeias. Conclusions: Preclinical evidence of safety and efficacy exists in the literature for most of the plants used to manufacture registered herbal products in Uganda. More specific bioassays and clinical trials are required for the products to provide conclusive evidence of safety and toxicity. Monographs are urgently needed for the Ugandan plantsen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWorld Bank through Pharm- Biotechnology and Traditional Medicine centre (PHARMBIOTRAC), African Center of Excellence II (ACEII) Project.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEvidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicineen_US
dc.subjectMedicinal Plantsen_US
dc.subjectHerbal Productsen_US
dc.subjectRegulatory Approvalen_US
dc.subjectPlantsen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.titleSafety and Efficacy of Medicinal Plants Used to Manufacture Herbal Products with Regulatory Approval in Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record