Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTugume, Rodgers
dc.contributor.authorLugobe, Henry Mark
dc.contributor.authorKato, Paul Kalyebara
dc.contributor.authorKajabwangu, Rogers
dc.contributor.authorKanyesigye, Hamson
dc.contributor.authorMasembe, Sezalio
dc.contributor.authorKayondo, Musa
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-22T07:51:58Z
dc.date.available2022-07-22T07:51:58Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-28
dc.identifier.citationTugume, R., Lugobe, H. M., Kato, P. K., Kajabwangu, R., Kanyesigye, H., Masembe, S., & Kayondo, M. (2022). Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Its Associated Factors Among Women Attending the Gynecology Outpatient Clinic at a Tertiary Hospital in Southwestern Uganda. International Journal of Women's Health, 14, 625.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/2269
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To determine the prevalence, clinical stage at presentation and factors associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) among women attending the gynecology outpatient clinic at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH), Uganda. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study at the gynecology outpatient clinic of MRRH from September 2019 to January 2020. Women aged 18–90 years were systematically sampled and recruited into this study. An interviewer administered questionnaire was used to collect participants’ socio-demographic, obstetric, gynecological and medical factors. POP stage was obtained by using the pelvic organ prolapse-quantification system. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to determine factors associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Results: Of 338 participants enrolled, the prevalence of POP was 27.5% [n = 93, 95% Cl: 23.0–32.5]. POP stages were stage I 11.8% (n = 11), stage II 63.4% (n = 59), stage III 16.1% (n = 15) and stage IV 8.9% (n = 8). Grand-multiparity (aOR 17.1, 95% CI: 1.1– 66.6), birth weight more than 3.5kg (aOR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.1–12.6), perineal tears (aOR 6.5, 95% CI: 2.1–20.2), peasant farmer (aOR 6.9, 95% CI: 1.6–29.9) and duration of labour in the first delivery >24 hours (aOR 5.7, 95% CI: 1.2–29) were significantly associated with POP. Conclusion: POP is common among women attending the gynecology clinic at MRRH with most of them presenting with stage II. There should be routine screening for POP to enable early identification and management especially in those who are grand multiparous, peasant farmers and have a history of perineal tearsen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Women’s Healthen_US
dc.subjectPelvic organ prolapseen_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectFactors associateden_US
dc.subjectPelvic organ prolapse quantification systemen_US
dc.subjectSouthwestern Ugandaen_US
dc.titlePelvic Organ Prolapse and Its Associated Factors Among Women Attending the Gynecology Outpatient Clinic at a Tertiary Hospital in Southwestern Ugandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record