Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNantongo, Hanifah
dc.contributor.authorKiguba, Ronald
dc.contributor.authorBatwala, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorMukonzo, Jackson
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-19T06:21:25Z
dc.date.available2022-10-19T06:21:25Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationNantongo, H., Kiguba, R., Batwala, V., & Mukonzo, J. (2022). An Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescription Rationality at Lower Primary Healthcare Facilities in Three Districts of South-Western Uganda. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 15, 2249-2259.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/2556
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Antimicrobial resistance is now one of the leading five causes of death globally. This study evaluated the rationality of antibiotic prescriptions at lower primary care levels in three districts of Southwestern Uganda. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study reviewed 9899 antibiotic prescriptions at 39 health centers following a drug delivery cycle by National Medical Stores in three phases (19 days each on average). Phase 1 started 3 days after delivery, mid-way (Phase 2) and towards the end (Phase 3). The proportion of rationally prescribed antibiotics was determined using a modified criterion by Badar and in reference to Uganda Clinical Guidelines (UCG). Using multivariate logistic regression, the factors associated with rational prescription were determined with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Seven of every 10 antibiotic prescriptions were irrational. Half the prescriptions were made by unauthorized personnel (nurses) and many of the pediatric prescriptions (916, 46.5%) did not bear body weight measurements to guide appropriate dosing. Also, the proportion of rational prescriptions in reference to UCG, 2016 was very low (3387, 34.2%). However, a high proportion of antibiotic prescriptions were legibly written (9462, 95.7%), prescribed by generic names (9083, 91.8%) and had a diagnosis (9677, 97.8%) indicated. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that; availability of medicines (phase 1) (phase 2 AOR=1.14, 95% CI:1.02– 1.28, phase 3, AOR=1.23, 95% CI:1.1–1.38), legibly written prescription (AOR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.47–0.78), indication of a date on the prescription (AOR=0.56, 95% CI0.38–0.81) and being a medical officer were factors associated with rational antibiotic prescription. Conclusion: We observed a high rate of irrational prescription in the study sites and the majority of these were by unauthorized personnel. A review of antibiotic use policies and focused interventions is crucial in these settingsen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSwedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) and Makerere University under Sida contribution No: 51180060.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Multidisciplinary Healthcareen_US
dc.subjectInappropriateen_US
dc.subjectAntibiotic prescriptionsen_US
dc.subjectAntibiotic resistanceen_US
dc.titleAn Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescription Rationality at Lower Primary Healthcare Facilities in Three Districts of South-Western Ugandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record