Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFredricks, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorKansiime, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorMushi, Martha F
dc.contributor.authorAsiimwe, Benon B
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T11:01:07Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T11:01:07Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationGreen, D. L., Keenan, K., Fredricks, K. J., Huque, S. I., Mushi, M. F., Kansiime, C., ... & Clarkson, M. (2023). The role of multidimensional poverty in antibiotic misuse: a mixed-methods study of self-medication and non-adherence in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. The Lancet Global Health, 11(1), e59-e68.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/2696
dc.description.abstractBackground Poverty is a proposed driver of antimicrobial resistance, influencing inappropriate antibiotic use in lowincome and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, at subnational levels, studies investigating multidimensional poverty and antibiotic misuse are sparse, and the results are inconsistent. We aimed to investigate the relationship between multidimensional poverty and antibiotic use in patient populations in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. Methods In this mixed-methods study, the Holistic Approach to Unravelling Antimicrobial Resistance (HATUA) Consortium collected data from 6827 outpatients (aged 18 years and older, or aged 14–18 years and pregnant) with urinary tract infection (UTI) symptoms in health-care facilities in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. We used Bayesian hierarchical modelling to investigate the association between multidimensional poverty and self-reported antibiotic selfmedication and non-adherence (ie, skipping a dose and not completing the course). We analysed linked qualitative in-depth patient interviews and unlinked focus-group discussions with community members. Findings Between Feb 10, 2019, and Sept 10, 2020, we collected data on 6827 outpatients, of whom 6345 patients had complete data; most individuals were female (5034 [79·2%]), younger than 35 years (3840 [60·5%]), worked in informal employment (2621 [41·3%]), and had primary-level education (2488 [39·2%]). Antibiotic misuse was more common among those least deprived, and lowest among those living in severe multidimensional poverty. Regardless of poverty status, difficulties in affording health care, and more familiarity with antibiotics, were related to more antibiotic misuse. Qualitative data from linked qualitative in-depth patient interviews (n=82) and unlinked focusgroup discussions with community members (n=44 groups) suggested that self-medication and treatment nonadherence were driven by perceived inconvenience of the health-care system, financial barriers, and ease of unregulated antibiotic access. Interpretation We should not assume that higher deprivation drives antibiotic misuse. Structural barriers such as inefficiencies in public health care, combined with time and financial constraints, fuel alternative antibiotic access points and treatment non-adherence across all levels of deprivation. In designing interventions to reduce antibiotic misuse and address antimicrobial resistance, greater attention is required to these structural barriers that discourage optimal antibiotic use at all levels of the socioeconomic hierarchy in LMICs.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUK National Institute for Health Researchen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe Lancet Global Healthen_US
dc.titleThe role of multidimensional poverty in antibiotic misuse: a mixed-methods study of self-medication and non-adherence in Kenya, Tanzania, and Ugandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record