Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAtukwatse, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorNiyonzima, Vallence
dc.contributor.authorAliga, Cliff Asher
dc.contributor.authorSerwadda, Jalia Nakandi
dc.contributor.authorNankunda, Rosemary
dc.contributor.authorNakiganda, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorKomugabe, Peninah
dc.contributor.authorNantongo, Hanifah
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-01T08:38:16Z
dc.date.available2023-02-01T08:38:16Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationAtukwatse, J., Niyonzima, V., Asher Aliga, C., Nakandi Serwadda, J., Nankunda, R., Nakiganda, C., ... & Nantongo, H. (2023). Validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Critical Care Settings of Three Selected Ugandan Hospitals. Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety, 13-23.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/2736
dc.description.abstractBackground: The safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) short form (2006) is important for assessing patient safety culture in clinical environments. However, little is known about its validity and applicability in Uganda. This study validated the SAQ short form (2006) for use in assessing patient safety culture in critical care settings of hospitals in the Ugandan context. Methods: Using a sequential exploratory mixed-methods research design, the face, content and construct validity for the SAQ short form (2006) was assessed in a multi-phased approach. A panel of eight (8) purposively selected experts assessed the face and content validity in rounds 1 and 2, respectively, while construct validity was assessed in round 3 using data from a cross-sectional survey of 256 frontline health workers in critical care settings of the selected hospitals. Analysis of survey data followed confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach’s alpha examined internal reliability. Results: Of the 36 items in the tool’s original version, 33 were rated clear, with a score of 100% on face validity. The use of contextual vocabulary and formatting issues arose as concerns. The S-CVI/Ave was 100%, and S-CVI/UA was 86.1%. Four new items added on effective communication as another dimension of patient safety culture. The survey had KMO=0.8605, the a priori-based model had a scale Cronbach’s alpha=0.8881, with unsatisfactory goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.051, 90% CI: 0.044–0.057, pclose=0.427; chi-square=694.28, p <0.001; CFI=0.884, TLI=0.871). The modified final model had a scale Cronbach’s alpha =0.8967 and satisfactory goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.030, 90% CI: 0.019–0.039, pclose=1.000; chi-square=424.98, p=0.002; CFI=0.966, TLI=0.960). Conclusion: In the tool’s original form, the face validity was lacking despite satisfactory scores on item clarity. Content validity was adequate, while construct validity required modifications in construct specifications. Reliability was adequate before and after specification modifications. The modified version has adequate psychometric properties for Ugandaen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFirst Mile projecten_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherDrug, Healthcare and Patient Safetyen_US
dc.subjectPatient safety cultureen_US
dc.subjectSAQen_US
dc.subjectTool validationen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.subjectUgandan contexten_US
dc.titleValidation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Critical Care Settings of Three Selected Ugandan Hospitalsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record