Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPerkins, Jessica M.
dc.contributor.authorKakuhikire, Bernard
dc.contributor.authorBaguma, Charles
dc.contributor.authorJeon, Sehee
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Sarah F.
dc.contributor.authorDongre, Rohit
dc.contributor.authorKyokunda, Viola
dc.contributor.authorJuliet, Mercy
dc.contributor.authorSatinsky, Emily N.
dc.contributor.authorComfort, Alison B.
dc.contributor.authorSiedner, Mark
dc.contributor.authorAshaba, Scholastic
dc.contributor.authorTsai, Alexander C.
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-02T08:52:26Z
dc.date.available2023-05-02T08:52:26Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationPerkins, J. M., Kakuhikire, B., Baguma, C., Jeon, S., Walker, S. F., Dongre, R., ... & Tsai, A. C. (2023). Perceived norms about male circumcision and personal circumcision status: a cross-sectional, population-based study in rural Uganda. medRxiv, 2023-04.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/2893
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Over the past decade, 15 high-priority countries in eastern and southern Africa have promoted voluntary medical male circucmsion for HIV and STI prevention. Despite male circumcision prevalence in Uganda nearly doubling from 26% in 2011 to 43% in 2016, it remained below the target level by 2020. Little is known about perceived norms of male circumcision and their association with circumcision uptake among men. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study targeting all adult residents across eight villages in Rwampara District, southwestern Uganda in 2020-2022. We compared what men and women reported as the adult male circumcision prevalence within their village (perceived norm: >50% (most), 10% to <50% (some), <10%, (few), or do not know) to the aggregated prevalence of circumcision as reported by men aged <50 years. We used a modified multivariable Poisson regression model to estimate the association between perceived norms about male circumcision uptake and personal circumcision status among men. Results: Overall, 167 (38%) men < 50 years old were circumcised (and 27% of all men were circumcised). Among all 1566 participants (91% response rate), 189 (27%) men and 177 (20%) women underestimated the male circumcision prevalence, thinking that few men in their own village had been circumcised. Additionally, 10% of men and 25% of women reported not knowing the prevalence. Men who underestimated the prevalence were less likely to be circumcised (aRR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.83) compared to those who thought that some village men were circumcised, adjusting for perceived personal risk of HIV, whether any same household women thought most men were circumcised, and other sociodemographic factors. Conclusions: Across eight villages, a quarter of the population underestimated the local prevalence of male circumcision. Men who underestimated circumcision uptake were less likely to be circumcised. Future research should evaluate norms-based approaches to promoting male circumcision uptake. Strategies may include disseminating messages about the increasing prevalence of adult male circumcision uptake in Uganda and providing personalized normative feedback to men who underestimated local rates about how uptake is greater than they thought.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipU.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01MH113494en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publishermedRxiven_US
dc.subjectMisperceived normsen_US
dc.subjectDescriptive normsen_US
dc.subjectHIVen_US
dc.subjectSTIen_US
dc.subjectMale circumcisionen_US
dc.subjectSexual healthen_US
dc.titlePerceived norms about male circumcision and personal circumcision status: a crosssectional, population-based study in rural Ugandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record