Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMiller, James S.
dc.contributor.authorMbusa, Rapheal Kisolhu
dc.contributor.authorBaguma, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Palka
dc.contributor.authorMatte, Michael
dc.contributor.authorNtaro, Moses
dc.contributor.authorBwambale, Shem
dc.contributor.authorKenney, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorGuiles, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorMulogo, Edgar Mugema
dc.contributor.authorStone, Geren S.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-30T08:30:06Z
dc.date.available2022-08-30T08:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationMiller, J. S., Mbusa, R. K., Baguma, S., Patel, P., Matte, M., Ntaro, M., ... & Stone, G. S. (2021). Assessing village health workers’ ability to perform and interpret rapid diagnostic tests for malaria 4 years after initial training: a cross-sectional study. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 104(1), 294.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/2425
dc.description.abstractVillage health workers (VHWs) in Bugoye subcounty, Uganda, provide integrated community case management (iCCM) care to children younger than 5 years for malaria, pneumonia, and diarrhea. We assessed the longevity of VHWs’ skills in performing and reading malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) 4 years after initial training, comparing VHWs who had completed initial iCCM training 1 year before the study with VHWs who had completed training 4 years before the study. Both groups received quarterly refresher trainings. Trained interviewers observed 36 VHWs reading six mock RDTs each and performing an RDT as part of a larger skills assessment exercise. VHWs read 97% of mock RDTs correctly; of the 36 VHWs, 86% read all six mock RDTs correctly. Most VHWs scored either 12/13 or 13/13 on the RDT checklist (39% and 36%, respectively), with 25% scoring 11/13 or lower. For reading mock RDTs, VHWs in the first group (initial training 4 years before study) read 97% of mock RDTs correctly, whereas those in the second group (initial training 1 year before study) read 96% of mock RDTs correctly; the first group had a mean of 5.83 RDTs read correctly, compared with 5.77 RDTs read correctly in the second group (P = 0.83). For performing an RDT, the first group completed a mean of 12.0 steps correctly, compared with a mean of 12.2 correct steps in the second group (P = 0.60). Overall, VHWs demonstrated proficiency in reading RDTs accurately and performing RDTs according to protocol at least 4 years after initial iCCM training.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMooney-Reed Charitable Foundation, Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Medicine, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, and Harvard Medical School Center for Primary Care.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygieneen_US
dc.subjectVillage health workersen_US
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
dc.subjectTestsen_US
dc.subjectMalariaen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.titleAssessing Village Health Workers’ Ability to Perform and Interpret Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria 4 Years after Initial Training: A Cross-Sectional Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Research Articles [432]
    These are different research articles about different Scholars

Show simple item record