Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShelus, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorMumbere, Nobert
dc.contributor.authorMasereka, Amos
dc.contributor.authorMasika, Bonita
dc.contributor.authorKiitha, Joackim
dc.contributor.authorNyangoma, Grace
dc.contributor.authorMulogo, Edgar M.
dc.contributor.authorBarrington, Clare
dc.contributor.authorBaguma, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorMuhindo, Rabbison
dc.contributor.authorJr, James E. Herrington
dc.contributor.authorEmch, Michael
dc.contributor.authorMaman, Suzanne
dc.contributor.authorBoyce, Ross M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-16T08:24:22Z
dc.date.available2022-12-16T08:24:22Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationShelus V, Mumbere N, Masereka A, Masika B, Kiitha J, Nyangoma G, et al. (2022) “Testing for malaria does not cure any pain” A qualitative study exploring low use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests at drug shops in rural Uganda. PLOS Glob Public Health 2(12): e0001235.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/2686
dc.description.abstractThe World Health Organization recommends all suspected malaria cases be confirmed with a parasitological test, typically a rapid diagnostic test (RDT), prior to treatment. Despite recommendations, many fevers presenting at private drug shops are treated presumptively as malaria without diagnostic testing. The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe community perceptions of RDTs and explore ways to improve malaria case management at drug shops in Bugoye, western Uganda. A total of 63 in-depth interviews were conducted between September and December 2021 with 24 drug shop clients, 19 drug shop vendors, 12 community health workers, and 8 health and community officials. Data was analyzed using thematic content analysis and narrative techniques. While drug shop clients valued RDTs, the cost of the test limited their use. Further, mistrust in negative results and fear about treatment options for conditions other than malaria led to non-adherence to negative RDTs. Improvement with antimalarial after a negative RDT, or no RDT at all, was seen as proof an individual had malaria, reinforcing the acceptability of liberal antimalarial use. Drug shop vendors were knowledgeable about malaria case management but financially conflicted between recommending best practices and losing business. While clients viewed drug shop vendors as trusted health professionals, health officials distrusted them as business owners focused on maximizing profits. Study results suggest public-private partnerships that recognize the essential role of drug shops, better incorporate them into the healthcare system, and leverage the high levels of community trust in vendors, could provide greater opportunities for oversight and training to improve private-sector malaria case management. Interventions that address financial barriers to RDT use, emphasize the financial benefits of malaria testing, increase vendor knowledge about illnesses confused with malaria, and improve the quality of vendor-client counseling could increase RDT uptake and improve adherence to RDT resultsen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipU.S. Department of State, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairsen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPLOS Glob Public Healthen_US
dc.subjectMalariaen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic testsen_US
dc.subjectDrug shopsen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.subjectParasitological testen_US
dc.titleTesting for malaria does not cure any pain a qualitative study exploring low use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests at drug shops in rural Ugandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Research Articles [432]
    These are different research articles about different Scholars

Show simple item record