Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSsedyabane, Frank
dc.contributor.authorNiyonzima, Nixon
dc.contributor.authorNgonzi, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorTusubira, Deusdedit
dc.contributor.authorOcan, Moses
dc.contributor.authorAkena, Dickens
dc.contributor.authorNamisango, Eve
dc.contributor.authorApunyo, Robert
dc.contributor.authorKinengyere, Alison Annet
dc.contributor.authorObuku, Ekwaro A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-07T13:10:08Z
dc.date.available2023-02-07T13:10:08Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationSsedyabane, F., Niyonzima, N., Ngonzi, J., Tusubira, D., Ocan, M., Akena, D., ... & Obuku, E. A. (2023). The diagnostic accuracy of serum microRNAs in detection of cervical cancer: a systematic review protocol. Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, 7(1), 1-7.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/2759
dc.description.abstractBackground: Cervical cancer remains a public health problem worldwide, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. There are challenges in timely screening and diagnosis for early detection and intervention. Therefore, studies on cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia suggest the need for new diagnostic approaches including microRNA technology. Plasma/serum levels of microRNAs are elevated or reduced compared to the normal state and their diagnostic accuracy for detection of cervical neoplasms has not been rigorously assessed more so in low-resource settings such as Uganda. The aim of this systematic review was therefore to assess the diagnostic accuracy of serum microRNAs in detecting cervical cancer. Methods: We will perform a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. We will search for all articles in MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL, as well as grey literature from 2012 to 2022. Our outcomes will be sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive values, positive predictive values or area under the curve (Nagamitsu et al, Mol Clin Oncol 5:189-94, 2016) for each microRNA or microRNA panel. We will use the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (Whiting et al, Ann Intern Med 155:529-36, 2011) tool to assess the risk of bias of included studies. Our results will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Diagnostic Test Accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA). We will summarise studies in a flow chart and then describe them using a structured narrative synthesis. If possible, we shall use the Lehmann model bivariate approach for the meta analysis Use of the review results: This systematic review will provide information on the relevance of microRNAs in cervical cancer. This information will help policy makers, planners and researchers in determining which particular microRNAs could be employed to screen or diagnose cancer of the cervixen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherDiagnostic and Prognostic Researchen_US
dc.subjectCervical canceren_US
dc.subjectSerum microRNAsen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic utilityen_US
dc.subjectCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.titleThe diagnostic accuracy of serum microRNAs in detection of cervical cancer: a systematic review protocolen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record