Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHoffman, Jeremy J.
dc.contributor.authorYadav, Reena
dc.contributor.authorSanyam, Sandip Das
dc.contributor.authorChaudhary, Pankaj
dc.contributor.authorRoshan, Abhishek
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Sanjay Kumar
dc.contributor.authorArunga, Simon
dc.contributor.authorHu, Victor H.
dc.contributor.authorMacleod, David
dc.contributor.authorLeck, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorBurton, Matthew J.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-01T12:25:58Z
dc.date.available2024-03-01T12:25:58Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationHoffman, J. J., Yadav, R., Sanyam, S. D., Chaudhary, P., Roshan, A., Singh, S. K., ... & Burton, M. J. (2022). Diagnosis of fungal keratitis in low-income countries: evaluation of smear microscopy, culture, and In vivo confocal microscopy in Nepal. Journal of Fungi, 8(9), 955.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/3441
dc.description.abstractClinically diagnosing fungal keratitis (FK) is challenging; diagnosis can be assisted by investigations including in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), smear microscopy, and culture. The aim of this study was to estimate the sensitivity in detecting fungal keratitis (FK) using IVCM, smear microscopy, and culture in a setting with a high prevalence of FK. In this cross-sectional study nested within a prospective cohort study, consecutive microbial keratitis (MK) patients attending a tertiary-referral eye hospital in south-eastern Nepal between June 2019 and November 2020 were recruited. IVCM and corneal scrapes for smear microscopy and culture were performed using a standardised protocol. Smear microscopy was performed using potassium hydroxide (KOH), Gram stain, and calcofluor white. The primary outcomes were sensitivities with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] for IVCM, smear microscopy and culture, and for each different microscopy stain independently, to detect FK compared to a composite referent. We enrolled 642 patients with MK; 468/642 (72.9%) were filamentous FK, 32/642 (5.0%) were bacterial keratitis and 64/642 (10.0%) were mixed bacterial-filamentous FK, with one yeast infection (0.16%). No organism was identified in 77/642 (12.0%). Smear microscopy had the highest sensitivity (90.7% [87.9–93.1%]), followed by IVCM (89.8% [86.9–92.3%]) and culture (75.7% [71.8–79.3%]). Of the three smear microscopy stains, KOH had the highest sensitivity (85.3% [81.9–88.4%]), followed by Gram stain (83.2% [79.7–86.4%]) and calcofluor white (79.1% [75.4–82.5%]). Smear microscopy and IVCM were the most sensitive tools for identifying FK in our cohort. In low-resource settings we recommend clinicians perform corneal scrapes for microscopy using KOH and Gram staining. Culture remains an important tool to diagnose bacterial infection, identify causative fungi and enable antimicrobial susceptibility testing.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWellcome Trusten_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Fungien_US
dc.subjectMicrobial keratitisen_US
dc.subjectFungal keratitisen_US
dc.subjectIn vivo confocal microscopyen_US
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
dc.subjectMicrobiologyen_US
dc.subjectNepalen_US
dc.subjectCorneaen_US
dc.subjectCultureen_US
dc.subjectMicroscopyen_US
dc.titleDiagnosis of Fungal Keratitis in Low-Income Countries: Evaluation of Smear Microscopy, Culture, and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Nepalen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record