Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAjayi, IkeOluwapo O.
dc.contributor.authorAdebamowo, Clement
dc.contributor.authorAdami, Hans-Olov
dc.contributor.authorDalal, Shona
dc.contributor.authorDiamond, Megan B
dc.contributor.authorBajunirwe, Francis
dc.contributor.authorGuwatudde, David
dc.contributor.authorNjelekela, Marina
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-23T12:38:32Z
dc.date.available2021-11-23T12:38:32Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationAjayi, I. O., Adebamowo, C., Adami, H. O., Dalal, S., Diamond, M. B., Bajunirwe, F., ... & Holmes, M. D. (2016). Urban–rural and geographic differences in overweight and obesity in four sub-Saharan African adult populations: a multi-country cross-sectional study. BMC public health, 16(1), 1-13.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/983
dc.descriptionUrban–rural and geographic differences in overweight and obesity.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Overweight and obesity are on the rise in developing countries including sub-Saharan Africa. We undertook a four-country survey to show the collective burden of these health conditions as they occur currently in sub-Saharan Africa and to determine the differences between urban and rural populations and other socioeconomic factors. Methods: Participants were nurses in two hospitals in Nigeria (200), school teachers in South Africa (489) and Tanzania (229), and village residents in one peri-urban (297) and one rural location in Uganda (200) who completed a standardised questionnaire. Their height and weight were measured and body mass index calculated. Factor analysis procedure (Principal component) was used to generate a wealth index. Univariate and multivariate analyses with binary logistic regression models were conducted to examine the associations between potential correlates and the prevalence of overweight and obesity with 95 % confidence intervals. Results: The prevalence of overweight and obese (combined) was 46 %, 48 %, 68 %, 75 % and 85 % in rural Uganda, peri-urban Uganda, Nigeria, Tanzania and South Africa (SA), respectively. Rural Uganda, Peri- urban Uganda, Nigeria, Tanzania and SA had obesity prevalence of 10 %, 14 %, 31 %, 40 % and 54 %, respectively (p < 0.001). Overall, prevalence of overweight was 374 (31 %) and obesity, 414 (34 %). Female sex was a predictor of overweight and obesity (combined) in peri-urban Uganda [AOR = 8.01; 95 % CI: 4.02, 15.96) and obesity in rural Uganda [AOR = 11.22; 95%CI: 2.27, 55.40), peri-urban Uganda [AOR = 27.80; 95 % CI: 7.13, 108.41) and SA [AOR = 2. 17; 95 % CI: 1.19, 4.00). Increasing age was a predictor of BMI > =25 kg/m2 in Nigeria [Age > =45 - AOR = 9.11; 95 % CI: 1.72, 48.16] and SA [AOR = 6.22; 95 % CI: 2.75, 14.07], while marital status was predictor of BMI > =25 kg/m2 only in peri-urban Uganda. [Married - AOR = 4.49; 95 % CI: 1.74, 11.57]. Those in Nigeria [AOR = 2.56; 95 % CI: 1.45, 4.53], SA [AOR = 4.97; 95 % CI: 3.18, 7.78], and Tanzania [AOR = 2.68; 95 % CI: 1.60, 4.49] were more likely to have BMI > =25 kg/m2 compared with the rural and peri-urban sites. Conclusion: The high prevalence of overweight and obesity in these sub-Saharan African countries and the differentials in prevalence and risk factors further highlights the need for urgent focused intervention to stem this trend, especially among women, professionals and urban dwellers.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMC Public Healthen_US
dc.subjectPrevalence of obesity and overweight, risk factors for over-nutrition, Sub-Saharan Africa, South Africa, Nigeria, Tanzania, Ugandaen_US
dc.titleUrban–rural and geographic differences in overweight and obesity in four sub-Saharan African adult populations: a multi-country cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Research Articles [436]
    These are different research articles about different Scholars

Show simple item record