Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLee, Guinevere Q.
dc.contributor.authorBangsberg, David R.
dc.contributor.authorMuzoora, Conrad
dc.contributor.authorBoum, Yap
dc.contributor.authorOyugi, Jessica H.
dc.contributor.authorEmenyonu, Nneka
dc.contributor.authorBennett, John
dc.contributor.authorHunt, Peter W.
dc.contributor.authorKnapp, David
dc.contributor.authorBrumme, Chanson J.
dc.contributor.authorHarrigan, P. Richard
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Jeffrey N.
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-15T09:08:01Z
dc.date.available2022-06-15T09:08:01Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationLee, G. Q., Bangsberg, D. R., Muzoora, C., Boum, Y., Oyugi, J. H., Emenyonu, N., ... & Martin, J. N. (2014). Prevalence and virologic consequences of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance in Uganda. AIDS research and human retroviruses, 30(9), 896-906.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.must.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/2134
dc.description.abstractFew reports have examined the impact of HIV-1 transmitted drug resistance (TDR) in resource-limited settings where there are fewer regimen choices and limited pretherapy/posttherapy resistance testing. In this study, we examined TDR prevalence in Kampala and Mbarara, Uganda and assessed its virologic consequences after antiretroviral therapy initiation. We sequenced the HIV-1 protease/reverse transcriptase from n = 81 and n = 491 treatment-naive participants of the Uganda AIDS Rural Treatment Outcomes (UARTO) pilot study in Kampala (AMU 2002–2004) and main cohort in Mbarara (MBA 2005–2010). TDR-associated mutations were defined by the WHO 2009 surveillance mutation list. Posttreatment viral load data were available for both populations. Overall TDR prevalence was 7% (Kampala) and 3% (Mbarara) with no significant time trend. There was a slight but statistically nonsignificant trend indicating that the presence of TDR was associated with a worse treatment outcome. Virologic suppression (£ 400 copies/ml within 6 months posttherapy initiation) was achieved in 87% and 96% of participants with wildtype viruses versus 67% and 83% of participants with TDR (AMU, MBA p = 0.2 and 0.1); time to suppression (log-rank p = 0.3 and p = 0.05). Overall, 85% and 96% of study participants achieved suppression regardless of TDR status. Surprisingly, among the TDR cases, approximately half still achieved suppression; the presence of pretherapy K103N while on nevirapine and fewer active drugs in the first regimen were most often observed with failures. The majority of patients benefited from the local HIV care system even without resistance monitoring. Overall, TDR prevalence was relatively low and its presence did not always imply treatment failureen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), National Institutes of Health (NIH) Centers for AIDS Research (CFAR) Program, National Institute of Mental Health RO-1 54907, P30 AI27763, and U01 CA066529, and National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism R-21 014784.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAIDS research and human retrovirusesen_US
dc.subjectHIV-1en_US
dc.subjectDrug Resistanceen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.subjectTDR prevalenceen_US
dc.subjectAntiretroviral therapy initiationen_US
dc.titlePrevalence and Virologic Consequences of Transmitted HIV-1 Drug Resistance in Ugandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record